Powell v. Greenstreet

Decision Date07 May 1888
Citation95 Mo. 13,8 S.W. 176
PartiesPOWELL v. GREENSTREET.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Moberly court of common pleas; G. H. BURCKHARTT, Judge.

Ejectment brought by J. M. Powell against J. M. Greenstreet. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

H. Lander and A. W. Myers, for appellant. Sears & Guthrie and W. M. Rutherford, for appellee.

BLACK, J.

Action of ejectment. Plaintiff put in evidence two deeds to himself, each for different portions of the premises sued for. The deeds were executed by the sheriff of Macon county, and are based upon judgments recovered in the name of the state to the use of the collector, in suits to enforce the state's lien for unpaid taxes. In one case the judgment was rendered against Mathsulah Bevier and W. D. Hicks, and in the other against W. D. Hicks. Plaintiff offered no other evidence of title whatever. It was admitted that the land had always been vacant up to the time defendant went into possession, that he had possession at the commencement of the suit, but it does not appear when or under whom he acquired possession. It must be taken as the settled law that purchasers at these sheriff's sales, made on executions in tax suits, acquire only the right, title, and interest of the defendants in the tax suits. Watt v. Donnell, 80 Mo. 196; Bank v. Grewe, 84 Mo. 478; Evans v. Robberson, 92 Mo. 192, 4 S. W. Rep. 941. But, conceding this, the plaintiff then insists that the deed makes out a prima facie case of title in the grantee, that is to say, of former ownership of the land by the defendants in the tax suits. This claim is based on section 6839, Rev. St. 1879, which declares that the deed "shall be prima facie evidence of title, and that the matters and things therein stated are true." The effect of this section is to make the deed evidence without production of judgment or execution; but it is evidence of no more than it, in contemplation of law, purports to be, namely, a conveyance of all of the title of the defendants in the execution. It is no evidence that the defendants in the special execution were the owners of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Keaton v. Jorndt
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 23, 1914
    ...who is not made a party to said tax proceedings (Watt v. Donnell, 80 Mo. 195; Stuart v. Ramsey, 196 Mo. loc. cit. 415 ). In Powell v. Greenstreet, 95 Mo. 13 , it was held that it must be taken as settled law that purchasers at these sheriff's sales made on execution in tax suits acquire onl......
  • Keaton v. Jorndt
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 23, 1914
    ...of the life estate saw fit to exercise the power of sale given to her by the terms of the will. Watt v. Donnell, 80 Mo. 197; Powell v. Grantstreet, 95 Mo. 15; v. Ray, 96 Mo. 415; Machine Co. v. Bowers, 200 Mo. 230. (4) The judgment of the court disregarded the will. There was no evidence to......
  • Gunter v. Townsend
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 23, 1918
    ...by the delinquent taxpayer. ***" 37 Cyc. 1474. Such is the rule in other jurisdictions. Hopper v. Malleson, 16 N.J.Eq. 382; Powell's Case, 95 Mo. 13, 8 S.W. 176; Morrow v. Dows, 28 N.J.Eq. 459; Nashville Cowan, 10 Lea (Tenn.) 209; Yenda v. Wheeler, 9 Tex. 408; Stansbury v. Inglehart, 9 Mack......
  • Blevins v. Smith
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 31, 1891
    ... ... title and interest of the parties who [104 Mo. 592] ... are made defendants." Graves v. Ewart , ... 99 Mo. 13, 11 S.W. 971; Powell v. Greenstreet , 95 ... Mo. 13, 8 S.W. 176 ...           An ... ordinary execution sale conveys to the purchaser all the ... right, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT