Powell v. State, 30190

Decision Date16 September 1975
Docket NumberNo. 30190,30190
Citation219 S.E.2d 109,235 Ga. 208
PartiesJerome POWELL v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Thomas J. Ratcliffe, Jr., Hinesville, for appellant.

John W. Underwood, Dist. Atty., Hinesville, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Kirby G. Atkinson, Staff Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.

INGRAM, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced in the Superior Court of Bryan County to serve a life imprisonment term for this offense. This appeal enumerates three alleged errors: (1) the trial judge failed to charge the jury on the law of misfortune or accident, which was placed in issue under the appellant's unsworn statement at the trial; (2) the trial judge's charge on reasonable doubt and the burden of the state were argumentative, weighted in favor of a verdict against (appellant), confusing and misleading; and (3) the evidence is legally insufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilty.

The state's evidence authorized the jury to find that in the early evening hours of January 27, 1973, in Bryan County, appellant's sister, Sarah Powell, and her boy friend, Joe Smith, had been to a local club where they had argued. While there, they encountered appellant outside the club and he decided to walk home with them. They walked to the home of Gladys Rivers. Upon arrival, Sarah Powell was crying and appellant tried to make her go inside the house. The victim of the homicide, Vera Dell Powell, appellant's aunt who was temporarily living in the Rivers' house, told appellant not to make his sister, Sarah, go inside the house. This angered appellant and he cursed his aunt Vera Dell, slapped her and then struck her with a sawed-off shotgun which he was carrying at the time. She turned around and appellant shot her with the shotgun, blowing off the top of her head, from approximately two feet away.

Less than two minutes elapsed between the time the victim, Vera Dell Powell, reprimanded appellant until he shot her. After the shooting, appellant fled from the scene of the homicide. Four witnesses, Gladys Rivers, Louvista Rivers, Frank Rivers and Sarah Powell, testified to observing either all or part of these events which resulted in the death of Vera Dell Powell. The appellant elected to make an unsworn statement at the trial in his own defense in which he stated the shotgun accidentally discharged during an argument and struggle between him and the victim at the house. None of the witnesses who testified under oath at the trial corroborated appellant's version of the homicide as being accidental. Held:

1. 'In passing on the general grounds of a motion for new trial, this court passes not on the weight but the sufficiency of the evidence. It is our duty to determine whether the verdict as rendered can be sustained under any reasonable view taken of the proofs submitted to the jury.' Ingram v. State, 204 Ga. 164, 184, 48 S.E.2d 891, 902. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury finding the appellant guilty of murder.

2. It will serve no useful purpose to set...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Pack v. Mahan
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • February 24, 2014
  • Marshall v. State, 32080
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • May 25, 1977
    ...the verdict. The motion for new trial was properly denied. Sheppard v. State, 235 Ga. 89, 218 S.E.2d 830 (1975); Powell v. State, 235 Ga. 208, 219 S.E.2d 109 (1975); Ridley v. State, 236 Ga. 147, 223 S.E.2d 131 (1976); Harris v. State, 236 Ga. 766, 225 S.E.2d 263 We affirm the judgment of t......
  • Thomas v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 27, 1977
    ...is sufficient under any reasonable view to support the verdict. Mays v. State, 237 Ga. 907, 230 S.E.2d 282 (1976); Powell v. State, 235 Ga. 208, 219 S.E.2d 109 (1975). The appellant complains that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, because the state failed to refute the ap......
  • Graham v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • February 12, 1976
    ...appellant's sanity was conflicting, there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict of the jury. See Powell v. State, 235 Ga. 208, 210(1), 219 S.E.2d 109 (1975). Judgment All the Justices concur. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT