Pratt v. Saline Valley Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 17 March 1908 |
Citation | 130 Mo. App. 175,108 S.W. 1099 |
Parties | PRATT et ux. v. SALINE VALLEY RY. CO. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Rev. St. 1899, § 1271 [Ann. St. 1906, p. 1044], provides that, where property will be, or has been, damaged by a corporation for public use, any person interested may have such damages ascertained, and the proceedings for ascertaining the damages shall be the same as are provided for assessing damages sustained by the appropriation of land for railroad purposes. Defendant railroad entered on plaintiff's land and constructed its right of way thereon without condemnation proceedings. Held, that plaintiff was entitled to bring an action for the land appropriated, and for damages for injury to the remainder of the land, and the remedy provided by the statute for damages was not exclusive.
3. COURTS — APPELLATE COURTS — ST. LOUIS COURT OF APPEALS—JURISDICTION — TITLE TO LAND.
In an action to recover for land appropriated by a railroad company, without condemnation proceedings, and for damages for injury to the land not appropriated, the title to the real estate taken was not involved or affected within the clause of the Constitution giving the Supreme Court jurisdiction in such cases, and this court has jurisdiction of an appeal therein.
4. EMINENT DOMAIN—COMPENSATION—MEASURE—LIMITED ESTATES—LIFE ESTATE.
In an action to recover for land appropriated by defendant railroad company as a right of way, and for damages for injury thereto, the owner's measure of damages therefor would be different if she owned the fee in the land than if she owned merely a life estate therein.
5. WILLS—CONSTRUCTION—NATURE OF ESTATE CREATED—DEVISE TO HEIRS—EFFECT.
The use of the word "heirs" to pass a fee to the devisee under a will is unnecessary, and adds nothing to the quantity of the estate devised, but it may be considered in ascertaining whether the intention was to vest a life estate in the devisee or the fee, when testator's intention is doubtful.
6. SAME—GENERAL DEVISE WITH POWER OF DISPOSITION—EFFECT.
Where the first named devisee in a will is given absolute power to dispose of the property, such devisee takes the fee unless the estate is expressly given for life only.
7. SAME—RESTRICTIONS AGAINST ALIENATION —EFFECT.
While a restriction contained in a will preventing the devisee or her heirs from selling the land devised for 50 years after testator's death was void as being an unlawful restraint on alienation, it may be considered as a circumstance showing testator's intention.
8. SAME—ESTATE DEVISED—LIFE ESTATE—IMPLICATION.
Testator devised certain land to his daughter and her heirs, and provided that neither she nor her heirs should sell or contract any debts on the land until 50 years after testator's death, his daughter to divide the land equally among her heirs, and, if she failed to do so, commissioners should be appointed to divide the land according to this provision. The will also contained similar devises of land to other children, some of which were to them and their direct heirs, conveying only a life estate. Held, upon a construction of the devise, that the daughter took only a life estate in the land, with remainder to her heirs.
9. SAME—FEE SIMPLE—SUBSEQUENT LIMITATIONS — SUFFICIENCY.
Where an estate in fee is given in unequivocal language in the first clause of the will, it cannot be cut down to a life estate in a subsequent clause without express words to that effect, or unless there is an unmistakable intention to do so.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Butler County; J. C. Sheppard, Judge.
Action by Joseph C. Pratt and wife against the Saline Valley Railway Company to recover for land appropriated by defendant and for damages. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
The will construed in this case reads as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bullock v. Peoples Bank of Holcomb
... ... expressing an intention to convey a life estate with ... remainder to heirs or children. Pratt v. Railroad, ... 130 Mo.App. 175; Gross v. Hoch, 149 Mo. 325; ... Kinney v. Mathews, 69 Mo ... ...
- Pratt v. Saline Valley Railway Co.
-
Van Every v. McKay
... ... 40 Cyc ... 1476; Thomas v. Thomas, 149 Mo. 245; Pratt v ... Railroad, 130 Mo.App. 175; Wadell v. Wadell, 99 ... Mo. 345; Gannon v. Pauk, 183 Mo. 270 ... ...
-
Van Every v. McKay
...in those in the class who are in existence at the time of the testator's death, 40 Cyc. 1476; Thomas v. Thomas, 149 Mo. 245; Pratt v. Railroad, 130 Mo. App. 175; Wadell v. Wadell, 99 Mo. 345; Gannon v. Pauk, 183 Mo. 270. McReynolds, McReynolds & Flanigan for respondent. (1) The devise to Ha......