Precision Power Co., Inc. v. Adams

Decision Date20 July 1983
Citation283 S.C. 553,325 S.E.2d 59
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesPRECISION POWER CO., INC., Respondent, v. William A. ADAMS and Lincoln Income Life Insurance Company, Defendants, Of Whom William A. Adams is Appellant. Appeal of William A. ADAMS.
ORDER

Earlier this year, the Court was called upon to construe the requirements of two statutes, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 14-11-90 and 15-31-10 (Supp. 1982). In January, we held that a direct appeal to the Supreme Court from a final judgment entered by a Master in Equity could be had only where either (1) the referring Court issued an order allowing such a direct appeal or (2) the parties consented to such an appeal. Glass v. Glass, 278 S.C. 527, 299 S.E.2d 693 (1983).

In April, we ruled that the consent provided for in S.C.Code Ann. § 14-11-90 (Supp.1982) must be made in writing at the time the order of reference is entered. Long v. Ehni, 325 S.E.2d 319 (S.C. 1983).

At present, there are a number of cases on direct appeal to this Court from Masters' final judgments where there are no written consents. To avoid confusion about the status of these appeals, we hold today that these two orders are to be applied prospectively only, from April 19, 1983, the date Long v. Ehni was filed. Any appeal from a Master's final judgment, filed with this Court prior to April 19, 1983, will not be dismissed for lack of written consent unless that issue was raised in the pleadings filed prior to that date.

In the present case, Notice of Intent to Appeal was filed in October, 1982. The failure of written consent as required by Long v. Ehni was not raised until Respondent moved to dismiss on May 13, 1983. For the foregoing reasons, we deny this motion.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Thatcher
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 12, 1984
  • Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 4, 1985
    ...the Glass decision would be applied prospectively only. Long v. Ehni, 283 S.C. 554, 325 S.E.2d 319 (1983); Precision Power Company, Inc. v. Adams, 283 S.C. 553, 325 S.E.2d 59 (1983). None of these decisions distinguished between appeals from masters or from special referees. The Court of Ap......
  • Windham v. Sanders
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • August 14, 1985
    ...of the parties at the time the order of reference was entered. See S.C.Code Ann. § 14-11-90 (Supp.1984); Precision Power Co., Inc. v. Adams, 283 S.C. 553, 325 S.E.2d 59 (1983); Long v. Ehni, 283 S.C. 554, 325 S.E.2d 319 (1983); Glass v. Glass, 278 S.C. 527, 299 S.E.2d 693 The appellate reco......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT