Price v. Clevenger

Decision Date27 April 1903
Citation74 S.W. 894,99 Mo.App. 536
PartiesFREDERICK E. PRICE, Respondent, v. JOSHUA M. CLEVENGER, Appellant
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

99 Mo.App. 536 at 545.

Original Opinion of April 27, 1903, Reported at: 99 Mo.App. 536.

Motion overruled.

OPINION

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

SMITH, P. J.

--The defendant suggests that plaintiff's instruction number one which authorized the jury if it found for plaintiff to include in its assessment of damages $ 10.55 costs which were adjudged to plaintiff by the Illinois court in the case in which the judgment sued on was recovered, was in that respect erroneous. As no statute of the State of Illinois was introduced in evidence under which a prevailing party is entitled to costs, and as we must presume the common law exists in that State, and as under it no costs were recoverable, it results that the instruction was erroneous. Hoover v. Railway, 115 Mo. 77.

But notwithstanding this, if the plaintiff will, within ten days hence remit the said amount of costs, $ 10.55, with six per cent interest thereon from April 20, 1878, amounting in the aggregate to $ 26.30, the motion for rehearing will be overruled, and the judgment of affirmance will be allowed to stand, otherwise it will be set aside.

It results, of course, that the costs of the appeal must be adjudged against the plaintiff.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT