Price v. Weisner
Decision Date | 05 November 1910 |
Docket Number | 16,676 |
Parties | MILBERT F. PRICE et al., Partners doing business as the United Jewelers Manufacturing Company, Appellants, v. A. A. WEISNER, Appellee |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided July, 1910.
Appeal from Ellis district court.
Judgment affirmed.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
1. SALES--Contract Not Sufficiently Definite and Certain. An order for $ 360 worth of jewelry, to be made up of articles named in a price list contained in the order is void where it can not be determined from the writing itself either the quantity, quality or price of any of the articles specified which the plaintiffs were bound to ship and which the defendant agreed to purchase.
2. SALES--Delivery Prerequisite to Action for the Purchase Price. The plaintiffs sued to recover for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered according to the terms of a written order. On the trial the plaintiffs introduced the original order and rested. Held, that if the order had constituted a valid and binding contract the court rightly sustained a demurrer in the absence of any testimony showing a delivery of the goods to the defendant.
A. D. Gilkeson, for the appellants.
W. E. Saum, for the appellee.
This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiffs' evidence. The plaintiffs sought to recover $ 360 for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant at his special instance and request, according to the terms of an alleged written contract. The petition set up a copy of the written instrument, which included an order for the shipment of goods to the amount named. The answer admitted signing the order and denied the other material averments of the petition. The following are the only portions of the writing which are pertinent to the issue involved:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Murphy v. Hanna
... ... 589, 50 N.E. 246; ... Durkee v. People, 155 Ill. 354, 46 Am. St. Rep. 340, ... 40 N.E. 626; Jones v. Vance Shoe Co. 115 F. 707; ... Price v. Wiesner, 83 Kan. 343, 31 L.R.A.(N.S.)927, ... 111 P. 439; Price v. Atkinson, 117 Mo.App. 52, 94 ... S.W. 816; Price v. Stipek, 39 Mont ... ...
-
Wilkes v. Stacy
... ... implied in any case where goods are purchased without any ... definite understanding as to price ... The ... question of mutuality of contract was considered in the case ... of Thomas-Huycke-Martin Co. v. Gray, 94 ... Ark ... ...
-
Hays v. Underwood
...general rule. (Nichols v. Coppock, 124 Kan. 652, 261 P. 574; Stratford v. Petticord, 108 Kan. 775, 197 P. 221; Price v. Weisner, 83 Kan. 343, 111 P.2d 439, 31 L.R.A.,N.S., 927.) Again, however, the courts generally have so far deviated from the general rule and set up so many exceptions tha......
-
Continental Jewelry Co. v. May
... ... The ... order form in itself is full, complete and definite in its ... description of the merchandise ordered ... Price ... v. Atkinson, 117 Mo.App. 52, 94 S.W. 816; Price v ... Weisner, 83 Kan. 343, 111 P. 439; Price v ... Stipek, 39 Mont. 426, 104 P. 195; 55 C ... ...