Priest v. F.W. Woolworth Five & Ten Cent Store
Decision Date | 19 August 1933 |
Citation | 62 S.W.2d 926,228 Mo.App. 23 |
Parties | NONA G. PRIEST, RESPONDENT, v. F. W. WOOLWORTH FIVE AND TEN CENT STORE, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Butler County.--Hon. Robert I Cope, Judge.
Reversed and remanded.
Henson & Woody for appellant.
Phillips & Phillips and L. R. Tedrick for respondent.
This is an action to recover damages for alleged injuries charged to have been the result of an assault upon plaintiff by the assistant manager of defendant in its store located in Poplar Bluff, Missouri. On trial to a jury plaintiff recovered a judgment in the sum of $ 3000 actual damages and defendant has appealed.
One of the errors assigned is that the trial court refused an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence offered at the close of the whole case. Looking to the evidence we find the facts most favorable to plaintiff to be substantially as follows: At the time of the accident which occurred on the 11th day of June, 1932, plaintiff was about twenty-three years of age and unmarried. Defendant corporation conducted a five and ten cent store in Poplar Bluff and had in its employ at the time as assistant manager of the store a young man named Hollis George, about nineteen years of age. Plaintiff entered the store of defendant in the evening of the day of the accident for the avowed purpose of making a purchase. Plaintiff testified that she was standing at a counter trying on some hats; that,
On cross-examination she testified as follows:
Mary Priest, a sister-in-law of plaintiff, testified that she saw the accident; that Mr. George took hold of plaintiff's shoulders and bent her back over the counter until her head touched and that she told him to let her up that he was hurting her; that he let her up and walked away; that he was supervisor over the salesmen and would act as salesman himself at times; that Mr. George was rather a jolly sort and that there was nothing to indicate he was "mad" at the time but the act was done in a kind of "playfulness."
Hollis George, a witness for defendant, testified on cross-examination as follows:
The foregoing is substantially all the evidence in the case as to the circumstances under which the accident occurred. Defendant urges that the act of George Hollis complained of was without the scope of his employment, had no connection with the business of his principal and that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ponticas v. KMS Investments, C7-81-1026.
...Stockyard Co., 192 Kan. 360, 388 P.2d 824 (1964); Strawder v. Harrall, 251 So.2d 514 (La.App.1971); Priest v. F.W. Woolworth Five & Ten Cent Store, 228 Mo.App. 23, 62 S.W.2d 926 (1933); Bennett v. T & F Distributing Co., 117 N.J.Super. 439, 285 A.2d 59 (1971), cert. denied 60 N.J. 350, 289 ......
-
Lavender v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
... ... v. L. & N.R. Co., 115 Ky. 447, 74 S.W. 171; Priest ... v. Woolworth etc. Co., 62 S.W.2d 926; Dewing v ... seen other waiters have a pistol four or five times in that ... period of time; that "it was sort of a ... ...
-
Oganaso v. Mellow
...344 Mo. 338; Calhoun v. Mining Co., 209 S.W. 318, 202 Mo.App. 564; Wolf v. Railroad, 282 Mo. 559; Halsey v. Metz, 93 S.W.2d 41; Priest v. Woolworth, 62 S.W.2d 926; Evans v. A.L. Dyke Co., 121 Mo.App. 266, 101 1132; Healey v. Wrought Iron Range Co., 143 S.W. 549; Brown v. Jarvis Co., 166 Mas......
-
Osment v. Pitcairn
... ... Kurn, 146 S.W.2d 578; Priest v. F. W. Woolworth ... Co., 228 Mo.App. 23, 62 ... "goosing." [Dewing v. New York Cent. R. Co., 281 ... Mass. 351, 183 N.E. 754.] There ... ...