Priory v. Anderson

• Decision Date: 25 June 1934
• Citation: 115 Fla. 624,156 So. 22
• Parties: PRIORY v. ANDERSON et al.
• Court: Florida Supreme Court

156 So. 22

115 Fla. 624

PRIORY v. ANDERSON et al.

Florida Supreme Court

June 25, 1934

En Banc.

Suit between Frank D. Priory and S. Anderson and others. On motion of first-named party to reinstate cause which had theretofore been dismissed.

Motion to reinstate dismissed cause denied. Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Geo. W. Tedder, judge.

COUNSEL

Ella Jo Stollberg, of Hollywood, for appellant.

Baxter & Walton, of Fort Lauderdale, and T. D. Ellis, Jr., and John W. Whelan, both of Hollywood, for appellees.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of appellant Frank D. Priory, to reinstate the above entitled cause which has heretofore been dismissed by this court on motion of appellees, the court, having fully considered all of the causes and things presented as grounds or causes for reinstatement, is of the opinion that the motion to reinstate should not be granted for the reason that a cursory inspection of the transcript of the record has revealed that no reversible error was committed with respect to the order of March 4, 1933, which is the sole order appealed from, therefore the motion to reinstate is denied.

Motion to reinstate dismissed cause denied.

DAVIS, C.J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, and BUFORD, JJ., concur.