Protter v. Brown Thompson and Co.
| Decision Date | 19 September 1991 |
| Citation | 597 A.2d 335,220 Conn. 910 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | Sophie PROTTER v. BROWN THOMPSON AND COMPANY et al. |
David J. Scully, Waterbury, in support of the petition.
Paul Ruszczyk, Cheshire, in opposition.
The fourth party plaintiff-appellant Clarence Butler's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn.App. 360, 593 A.2d 524, is granted, limited to the following issue:
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Kelley v. Tomas
...in a reply brief. Protter v. Brown Thompson & Co., 25 Conn. App. 360, 363-64 n.2, 593 A.2d 524 [cert. granted on other grounds, 220 Conn. 910, 597 A.2d 335 (1991) (appeal withdrawn)]; L. F. Pace & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 9 Conn. App. 30, 45 n.8, 514 A.2d 766, cert. denied, 20......
-
Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
...of the three parties was intertwined. See Protter v. Brown Thompson & Co., 25 Conn. App. 360, 363, 593 A.2d 524, cert. granted, 220 Conn. 910, 597 A.2d 335 (1991) (appeal withdrawn). Heyman, at the time the plaintiff asserted his claim against him, was not only a third party defendant but w......