Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. J.R. Franclen, Inc.
| Decision Date | 04 June 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. C-4909,C-4909 |
| Citation | 710 S.W.2d 568 |
| Parties | The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. J.R. FRANCLEN, INC., Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
This is an appeal from a summary judgment rendered in a suit for unlawful conversion. On June 5, 1980, Franclen, a foreign corporation unauthorized to do business in Texas, filed suit against Prudential and two other parties that are not before this court. Prudential filed a plea in abatement asserting that Franclen was unable to maintain its suit because it had not obtained a certificate of authority from the Secretary of State authorizing it to do business in Texas. TEX.BUS.CORP.ACT ANN. art. 8.18(A) (Vernon 1980). After a hearing, the trial court signed an order abating the action for six months to allow Franclen to obtain the necessary certificate. On June 24, 1983, Franclen obtained the certificate of authority and the case was accordingly placed back on the trial court's docket.
However, approximately ten months later, Prudential filed a motion for summary judgment alleging that Franclen's action was barred by the statute of limitations because Franclen was unable to maintain his action until June 24, 1983, which was after the applicable statute of limitations had run. In its response to Prudential's motion for summary judgment, Franclen argued that its original filing interrupted the statute of limitations regardless of whether it had qualified to do business in the State of Texas as a foreign corporation. Franclen then cited a section from Texas Jurisprudence 2d which states that an amendment to a pleading which merely supplies omissions or corrects mistakes in an original pleading, such as failing to allege permission to do business in Texas, "relates back" to the time of the original pleading. 37 Tex.Jur.2d Limitation of Actions § 126 (1962). The trial court granted Prudential's motion for summary judgment and rendered a final judgment dismissing the action with prejudice.
In its sole point of error on appeal, Franclen asserted that it was authorized to file suit in Texas despite its failure to obtain a certificate of authorization because it was suing on an activity that is excepted from Article 8.18(A)'s bar. The court of appeals, in an unpublished opinion, reversed the trial court's judgment but did so on the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
S & A Restaurant Corp. v. Leal
...to reverse the judgment of the trial court in the absence of a properly assigned point of error. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. J.R. Franclen, Inc., 710 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex.1986); Gulf Consolidated Int'l, Inc. v. Murphy, 658 S.W.2d 565, 566 (Tex.1983). It should be further noted that an......
-
Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, 16–0328
...is not authorized to reverse a trial court's judgment in the absence of properly assigned error."); Prudential Ins. Co. v. J.R. Franclen, Inc. , 710 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex. 1986) (per curiam) ("An appellate court is not authorized to reverse a trial court's judgment in the absence of properly......
-
Jefferson Cnty. v. Nguyen
...or with Graham. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a), 38.1(i). We will not reverse on unassigned error. See Prudential Ins. Co. v. J.R. Franclen, Inc., 710 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex. 1986) (citing Gulf Consol. Int'l, Inc. v. Murphy, 658 S.W.2d 565, 566 (Tex. 1983)). Rather, with respect to the County's c......
-
1320/1390 Don Haskins, Ltd. v. Xerox Commercial Solutions, LLC
...court is not authorized to reverse a trial court’s judgment in the absence of properly assigned error. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. J.R. Franclen, Inc. , 710 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex. 1986). However, to the extent that at least one sub-argument—whether the TPA supports a term coterminous with ......