Pryor v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Ry. Co.

Decision Date31 October 1878
PartiesPRYOR v. THE ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY & NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Schuyler Circuit Court.--HON. JOHN W. HENRY, Judge.

Wells H. Blodgett and Higbee & Shelton for appellant.

NORTON, J.

On the 25th day of August, 1875, plaintiff filed a statement before M. H. Lewis, a justice of the peace, Prairie township, in Schuyler county, complaining, among other things, that defendant, in June, 1875, ran its train of cars upon one of plaintiff's cows by its carelessness and negligence, whereby said cow was crippled and damaged; that said crippling was done on a part of defendant's road in said township, not fenced on the sides thereof, and passing along and through uninclosed prairie lands, without cattle guards at the crossings. Summons was issued and served, and on September 21st 1875, the cause was tried, resulting in a judgment for plaintiff. An appeal was regularly taken to the circuit court of said county, and upon a trial de novo, judgment was rendered for plaintiff for $15.

It was agreed by counsel for plaintiff and defendant that the injury complained of occurred on the line of defendant's railroad, within that portion of the town of Greentop, a duly incorporated town in Schuyler county which is laid off into blocks, lots and streets, the plat of which town is duly executed and acknowledged, showing that it is so laid off as before stated, and that said plat was on file in the proper office previous to the date of the injuries complained of; the cow was struck and crippled by a heavy through freight train going south, moving at the rate of six miles per hour, at a point about half way up a heavy grade about one mile long, and that the cow was struck in he night.

Defendant asked the following instructions, of which those numbered one and four were given, and three, five and six refused: 1. The court declares that the killing and crippling of plaintiff's stock having occurred within that part of the town of Greentop platted and laid off on both sides of defendant's road into blocks, lots, streets and alleys, the plaintiff cannot recover, unless he proves by a preponderance of the testimony that the defendant was guilty of actual negligence in killing and crippling the stock sued for. 3. If the court finds from the testimony that plaintiff's cow was crippled by a heavy through freight train moving south, and at a point about half way up a heavy grade about one mile in length, and between fifty and one hundred yards south of a sharp curve, and when so striking said cow said train was moving at the rate of six miles per hour, the verdict will be for the defendant on that issue. 4. If said train could not have been safely checked or stopped, so as to avoid a collision with said cow, the verdict will be for defendant on that issue. 5. If, in case said train had been stopped to avoid a collision with said cow, it would have been unable to ascend said grade without backing down to the level at the foot of said grade, the verdict will be for the defendant on that issue. 6. In actions for killing stock within that portion of towns and cities platted and laid off into blocks, lots, streets and alleys, before plaintiff can recover...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Bell v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R.R. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • October 31, 1885
    ...the ordinary means to try to avoid the calamity. Pa. Railroad v. Lewis, 79 Pa. St. 33; C. & A. Ry. Co. v. Engle, 84 Ill. 397; Pryor v. Railroad, 69 Mo. 215, 218; Massoth v. Canal Company, 64 N. Y. 524; Wharton on Negligence, sec. 388, and note 5 (2 Ed.); 1 Thompson on Negligence, p. 418, se......
  • Klockenbrink v. St. Louis & Meramec River Railroad Company
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • March 17, 1903
    ...by all the attendant facts and surrounding circumstances. Taylor v. Railroad, 83 Mo. 390; Stepp v. Railroad, 85 Mo. 234; Pryor v. Railroad, 69 Mo. 215; Duffy Railroad, 19 Mo.App. 388. Defendant was not entitled to an instruction singling out the fact of the non-liability of defendant for fa......
  • Stepp v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • October 31, 1884
    ...villages and over frequented public crossings, and the rate of speed must be made to conform reasonably with the surroundings. Pryor v. Railroad Co., 69 Mo. 215. The defendant's seventh instruction was properly refused. 2. There was evidence tending to show that the train was running at a f......
  • Robertson v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • October 31, 1884
    ...and the company is liable. Owens v. H. &. St. Jo. R. R. Co., 58 Mo. 386; Isabel v. H. & St. Jo. R. R. Co., 60 Mo. 475; Pryor v. St. L., K. C. & N. Ry. Co., 69 Mo. 215; Harlan v. St. L., K. C. & N. Ry. Co., 65 Mo. 22. (5) All the law applicable to the case was given in plaintiff's first and ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT