Pryse v. People's Building, Loan & Saving Ass'n

Decision Date22 June 1897
Citation41 S.W. 574
PartiesPRYSE et ux. v. PEOPLE'S BUILDING, LOAN & SAVING ASS'N.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from circuit court, Lee county.

"Not to be officially reported."

Action by the People's Building, Loan & Savings Association against E. M. Pryse and wife to enforce a mortgage lien on real estate. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Reversed.

H. L Whecler, W. H. Holt, and H. C. Lilly, for appellants.

G. W Gourley, for appellee.

WHITE J.

This action was instituted by the appellee, the People's Building, Loan & Savings Association, against the appellant E. M. Pryse to enforce a mortgage lien on certain property in the town of Beattyville, Lee county. The amount of the debt to secure which the mortgage was executed is recited in the mortgage, and so claimed in the petition, to be $2,500. The appellee is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of New York, and it is alleged that by the terms of the contract the loan of appellant was to be paid in New York state, at Geneva, the home office. It is alleged that this sum loaned was to be repaid by the monthly payments of certain sums as dues on his stock, and as interest or premium on his loan. The contract provides, which is pleaded, that upon default of monthly payments, as provided, the whole sum should become due, and it is alleged that default had been made. It is also provided that, in case of suit to enforce the mortgage, a reasonable attorney's fee be included in the judgment, and paid by the appellant. The answer of appellant pleaded certain payments, amounting to $392.16, and further that he only received $2,250, and not $2,500, as recited in the mortgage; that the said $2,500 was on its face discounted 10 per cent. before he received any money; and pleaded that he only owed appellee the said $2,250, with interest at 6 per cent. from the date of the mortgage, less the several payments, to be credited as partial payments leaving due appellee about $1,849; pleaded the statutes against usury; denied their obligation to pay an attorney's fee of $250, as claimed in the petition, or in any sum. The court upon proof rendered judgment for appellee in the sum of $2,895.36, less payments amounting to $418.35 leaving the judgment for the sum of $2,471.01, but denied appellee a judgment or allowance for attorney's fee in any sum, and rendered judgment and order of sale of the house and lot in Beattyville....

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People's Building & Loan Ass'n v. McPhillamy
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 24 Noviembre 1902
    ...Buist v. Bryan, 44 S. C., 121; Rhodes v. Ass'n, 173 Ill. 621; Simpson v. B. & L. Ass'n, 41 S.W. 570; (s.c., 42 S.W. 834); Price v. B. & L. Ass'n, 41 S.W. 574; B. & Ass'n v. Taylor, 41 Md. 409; Williar v. B. & L. Ass'n, 45 Md. 546; Mills v. B. & L. Ass'n, 75 N.C. 292; B. & L. Ass'n v. Griffi......
  • Tiley v. Grenada Building & Loan Ass'n
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 15 Junio 1926
    ... ... Harris, 98. Ky. 41; Pryse v. People's etc., ... Ass'n, 41 S.W. 574 ... Wherever ... the ... come within the saving clause of that section. This section ... reads as follows: ... 999, n. 14. Applicability of usury laws ... to building & loan assn's, see 4 R. C. L., p. 373; 1 R ... C. L., Supp. p. 1127 ... ...
  • Shannon v. Georgia State Building & Loan Ass'n
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 11 Marzo 1901
    ... ... the question under discussion: U. S. B. & L. Assn ... v. Scott , 98 Ky. 695, 34 S.W. 235, decided in 1896, ... the ... only makes the intent to evade the more manifest." ... Pryse ... v. People's B. & L. Ass'n , 19 Ky. L. Rep ... 752, 41 S.W. 574, ... ...
  • National Building & Loan Ass'n v. Wilson
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 18 Marzo 1901
    ...and provide that the laws of another state shall control, and thus defeat the operation of the usury laws of Kentucky. Pryse v. P. B. & L. Asso., 41 S.W. 574; Lockmane v. S. Sav. & L. Asso., 44 S.W. 977. The case at bar is stronger than the Crofton case, for the reason that the borrower did......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT