Public Laundries v. Taylor, 9488.
Decision Date | 26 March 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 9488.,9488. |
Citation | 26 S.W.2d 1085 |
Parties | PUBLIC LAUNDRIES, Inc. v. TAYLOR. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Harris County; Ewing Boyd, Judge.
Suit by the Public Laundries, Inc., against R. J. Taylor. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Fulbright, Crooker & Freeman and W. B. Bates, all of Houston, for appellant.
Morris, Sewell, Taylor & Morris, of Houston, for appellee.
Public Laundries, Inc., instituted this suit in the Fifty-Fifth district court of Harris county on the 20th day of February, 1930, praying for the issuance of an injunction to restrain R. J. Taylor "from calling for and delivering laundried or unlaundried goods to persons who have been customers of plaintiff, either for himself or for other persons or companies; that he be restrained from, either for himself or for other persons or companies, calling for and delivering laundried and unlaundried goods to persons served or supplied by defendant during the term he was employed under the contract with plaintiff; that defendant be restrained from, either for himself or for any other persons or companies, soliciting, diverting, taking away, and/or attempting to solicit, divert, or take away, either directly or indirectly, any of the customers or business or patronage of such customers of plaintiff; that defendant be restrained, either for himself or for any other person or companies, from engaging either directly or indirectly in the laundry business or from calling for or delivering laundried or unlaundried goods in those sections of the City of Houston bounded on the North by the S. A. & A. P. tracks at Main Street, on the east by and including Main Street, on the South by and including Bellaire, and on the West by the S. A. & A. P. Railway tracks, and that on final hearing said injunction be made permanent and binding upon defendant effective until six months from February 15, 1930, but that until hearing as to whether said injunction be made permanent, a temporary restraining order be issued restraining the defendant from any and all of the acts complained of."
The plaintiff attached to and made part of its petition a copy of a contract entered into between it and defendant Taylor, of date February 15, 1929, reading as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dutch Maid Bakeries, Inc. v. Schleicher
... ... v ... McMenamy, 290 Mass. 549, 195 N.E. 747. See, Public ... Laundries v. Taylor, (Tex. Civ. App.) 26 S.W.2d 1085; ... Chicago ... ...
-
Associated Spring Corp. v. Roy F. Wilson & Avnet, Inc.
...is such a breach of the Salesman's Agreement as would preclude enforcement of the restrictive covenant. Public Laundries, Inc. v. Taylor, 26 S.W.2d 1085 (Tex.Civ.App.1930). In the Taylor case, the defendant had been hired to serve a designated territory by calling for and delivering laundry......