Public Medical Assistance Trust Fund v. Hameroff

Citation736 So.2d 1150
Decision Date08 April 1999
Docket NumberNo. 90,326.,90,326.
PartiesPUBLIC MEDICAL ASSISTANCE TRUST FUND, et al., Petitioners, v. Nathan M. HAMEROFF, M.D., et al., Respondents.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Eric J. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioners.

Murray B. Silverstein of Powell, Carney, Hayes & Silverstein, P.A., St. Petersburg, Florida, and Cynthia A. Mikos of Holland & Knight LLP, Brandon, Florida, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Public Medical Assistance Trust Fund v. Hameroff, 689 So.2d 358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), which expressly and directly conflicts with the decision in Nemeth v. Florida Department of Revenue, 686 So.2d 778 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently quashed the Fourth District's decision in Nemeth because the respondents in that case failed to file suit challenging the constitutionality of the vehicle impact fee statute1 within the three-year time limit mandated by section 215.26(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). Department of Revenue v. Nemeth, 733 So.2d 970 (Fla.1999). Accordingly, we approve the decision in Hameroff to the extent that it is consistent with our opinion in Nemeth. However, we find it necessary to remand this case with directions that the trial court determine if all the representative class members filed suit based solely upon allegations that the tax was unconstitutional and within three years after making payment of the "assessment" contained in section 395.7015(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1993).

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., SHAW, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., and OVERTON, Senior Justice, concur.

PARIENTE, J. did not participate in this case.

1. § 320.072(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1990).

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Reinish v. Clark, 1D98-3973.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 20 Julio 2000
    ...action." Public Medical Assistance Trust Fund v. Hameroff, 689 So.2d 358, 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved in pertinent part, 736 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1999); Department of Revenue v. Nemeth, 733 So.2d 970, 973-74 (Fla.1999). The Reinishes are neither challenging their assessment nor seeking an ......
  • State, Dept. of Highway Safety v. Sarnoff
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 29 Diciembre 2000
    ...197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Public Medical Assistance Trust Fund v. Hameroff, 689 So.2d 358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved in part, 736 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1999); P.R. Marketing Group, Inc. v. GTE Florida, Inc., 747 So.2d 962 (Fla. 2d DCA The P.R. Marketing fact scenario is analogous to the uncontr......
  • PR MARKETING GROUP v. GTE Florida, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 20 Agosto 1999
    ...denying their motion to certify as a class. Based on the Florida supreme court's recent decisions in Pub. Medic. Assistance Trust Fund v. Hameroff, 736 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1999), Miami Tiresoles, Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue, 732 So.2d 322 (Fla.1999), and Dep't of Revenue v. Nemeth, 733 So.2d 970 (......
  • Hameroff v. Pmatf, 1D04-1120.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 6 Octubre 2005
    ...supreme court approved our decision. See Pub. Med. Assistance Trust Fund v. Hameroff, 689 So.2d 358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 736 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1999). In 1996, the plaintiffs moved to stay the enforcement of the PMATF assessments and to abate the accrual of penalties during the pende......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT