Public Utility Dist. No. 1 of Lewis County v. Washington Public Power Supply System
| Decision Date | 11 February 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 50238-2,50238-2 |
| Citation | 713 P.2d 1109 |
| Parties | PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF LEWIS COUNTY, et al, Respondents, v. WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, Respondent, Chemical Bank, Appellant. |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
It is hereby ordered that the opinion in the above cause, as the same appears at 104 Wash.2d 353, 705 P.2d 1195, be changed as follows:
1. The word "the" in the twentieth line from the top of page 357, 705 P.2d page 1201 is deleted, and the word "certain" is inserted in its place.
2. The word "the" in the third line from the bottom of page 357, 705 P.2d page 1201 is deleted, and the word "certain" is inserted in its place.
3. The words "several summary judgment motions" in the tenth and eleventh lines from the top of page 359, 705 P.2d page 1202 are deleted, and the word "actions" is inserted in their place.
4. The word "the" in the eleventh line from the bottom of page 364, 705 P.2d page 1204 is deleted, and the word "various" is inserted in its place.
5. The words "many of" are inserted before the word "these" in the third line from the bottom of page 364, 705 P.2d page 1204.
6. The word "the" before the word "Participants" in the fourth line from the top of page 365, 705 P.2d page 1204 is deleted, and the word "some" is inserted in its place.
7. The word "the" before the word "Participants" in the eighth line from the top of page 365, 705 P.2d page 1204 is deleted, and the word "various" is inserted in its place.
8. The word "The" in the fourth line from the bottom of page 365, 705 P.2d page 1205 is deleted, and the word "Some" is inserted in its place.
9. The word "The" in the sixth line from the top of page 366, 705 P.2d page 1205 is deleted, and the word "Some" is inserted in its place.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ellis v. William Penn Life Assur. Co. of America
...P.2d 538 (1969); McDaniels v. Carlson, 108 Wash.2d 299, 308, 738 P.2d 254 (1987); PUD 1 v. WPPSS, 104 Wash.2d 353, 365, 705 P.2d 1195, 713 P.2d 1109 (1985)). See also Colonial Imports, Inc. v. Carlton Northwest, Inc., 121 Wash.2d 726, 734-36, 853 P.2d 913 (1993).18 472 U.S. 299, 105 S.Ct. 2......
-
Nationscapital Mortg. Corp. v. State Dfi
...relinquishment of a known right. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys., 104 Wash.2d 353, 365, 705 P.2d 1195, 713 P.2d 1109 (1985). Waiver can be inferred only from conduct inconsistent with any intention other than such relinquishment. Pub. Util. Dist., 104 Wash.2d at 365, ......
-
Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title Ins. Co.
...the mistake but treats that knowledge as sufficient. Public Util. Dist. 1 of Lewis Cy. v. WPPSS, 104 Wash.2d 353, 362, 705 P.2d 1195, 713 P.2d 1109 (1985). Denny's argues that its complaint should have been amended because evidence of mutual mistake only came to light during discovery after......
-
Butko v. STEWART TITLE
...738, 743, 725 P.2d 417 (1986); Public Util. Dist. No. 1 v. Washington Pub. Power Supply Sys., 104 Wash.2d 353, 378, 705 P.2d 1195, 713 P.2d 1109 (1985); Judkins v. Sadler-Mac Neil, 61 Wash.2d 1, 3, 376 P.2d 837 (1962).17 The plaintiff's remedy in a conversion action is to receive from the d......
-
Table of Cases
...881 P.2d 1020 (1994): 21.3(4)(e) Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys., 104 Wn.2d 353, 705 P.2d 1195 (1985), modified, 713 P.2d 1109 (1986): 12.5(1) Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 of Clark Cnty v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd., 137 Wn.App. 150, 151 P.3d 1067 (2007): 13.2(4) TC-17 ......
-
§56.6 Analysis
...party. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 of Lewis Cnty. v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys., 104 Wn.2d 353, 361, 705 P.2d 1195 (1985), modified, 713 P.2d 1109 Affidavits must be made on personal knowledge of the affiant. CR 56(e); McKee, 113 Wn.2d 701; Nat'l Union Ins. Co. v. Puget Sound Power & Light, 94......
-
§12.5 Mistake
...which the parties contract." Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys., 104 Wn.2d 353, 362, 705 P.2d 1195 (1985), modified, 713 P.2d 1109 (1986) (citations omitted). As noted by the Washington Supreme Court, "[o]rdinary shifts in market conditions or financial ability do not ju......