Pulley v. McNeal

Decision Date19 June 1997
Citation240 A.D.2d 913,658 N.Y.S.2d 732
PartiesStephanie PULLEY, Appellant, v. Richard McNEAL, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

De Lorenzo, Gordon, Pasquariello, Weiskopf & Harding, P.C. (Richard H. Weiskopf, of counsel), Schenectady, for appellant.

Friedman, Hirschen, Miller, Coughlin & Campito, P.C. (Lynn M. Blake, of counsel), Schenectady, for respondent.

Before MIKOLL, J.P., and MERCURE, CREW, YESAWICH and PETERS, JJ.

YESAWICH, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), entered January 24, 1996 in Schenectady County, which, inter alia, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Defendant is the owner of a two-family residence located at 927 Delamont Avenue in the City of Schenectady, Schenectady County. In September 1993, defendant leased the first-floor apartment to Shirley Dixon, plaintiff's sister. Approximately two months later, while plaintiff was asleep on the couch in the living room of Dixon's apartment, the ceiling collapsed and plaintiff was injured. Plaintiff thereafter commenced this negligence action against defendant. Following joinder of issue, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff opposed the motion and cross-moved for leave to amend the complaint. Supreme Court, inter alia, granted defendant's motion and this appeal by plaintiff ensued.

We affirm. "It is well settled that in order for a landlord to be held liable for injuries resulting from a defective condition upon the premises, the plaintiff must establish that the landlord had actual or constructive notice of the condition for such a period of time that, in the exercise of reasonable care, it should have been corrected" (Juarez v. Wavecrest Mgt. Team, 88 N.Y.2d 628, 646, 649 N.Y.S.2d 115, 672 N.E.2d 135; see, Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 492 N.E.2d 774; Warren v. Wilmorite Inc., 211 A.D.2d 904, 905, 621 N.Y.S.2d 184). Plaintiff has failed to make this showing here.

It is undisputed that defendant purchased the subject property in 1966 and that, in 1987 or 1988, he hired a contractor to install a drop ceiling below the existing fixed tin ceiling in the first-floor apartment. After the new ceiling was installed, defendant leased the apartment to other tenants and finally to Dixon in 1993. Although the apartment had been periodically inspected by the Schenectady Building Inspector's office and defendant had a right to enter the premises to make repairs under the lease with Dixon, the record is devoid of proof that defendant was advised of defects in the drop ceiling, or that he was, or should have been, aware of a defective or dangerous condition as a result of his own observation. Plaintiff herself...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Oates v. Iacovelli
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 20, 2011
    ...condition ( see Litwack v. Plaza Realty Invs., Inc., 11 N.Y.3d at 821, 869 N.Y.S.2d 388, 898 N.E.2d 571; Pulley v. McNeal, 240 A.D.2d 913, 913, 658 N.Y.S.2d 732 [1997] ). Here, defendants had the leased premises, including the deck, built 13 years before the accident. Defendant James Iacove......
  • Hill v. Cartier
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 4, 1999
    ...a determination that a dangerous condition existed and defendant had the required notice of that condition (see, Pulley v. McNeal, 240 A.D.2d 913, 658 N.Y.S.2d 732; Walsh v. City School Dist. of Albany, 237 A.D.2d 811, 654 N.Y.S.2d 859; Warren v. Wilmorite, supra We have considered defendan......
  • Perez v. 2305 Univ. Ave., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • April 1, 2010
    ...of a ceiling , to prevail at trial, a plaintiff must prove defendant's knowledge of a defect before the collapse (see, Pulley v. McNeal, 240 A.D.2d 913 [1st Dept. 1997]), and if the claim is that the collapse was due to water leakage," a plaintiff must show that the defendant had prior noti......
  • Lupi v. Home Creators Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 14, 1999
    ...or had actual or constructive notice of the condition and failed to correct it within a reasonable period of time (see, Pulley v. McNeal, 240 A.D.2d 913, 658 N.Y.S.2d 732). Plaintiff argues that defendant had notice of a water leak prior to her accident but failed to have it An examination ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT