Quaker City Nat. Bank v. Nolan County

Decision Date31 January 1894
Docket Number1,487.
Citation59 F. 660
PartiesQUAKER CITY NAT. BANK v. NOLAN COUNTY.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas

Williams & Butts, for plaintiff.

Leake Henry, Miller & Reeves and Cowan & Fisher, for defendant.

RECTOR District Judge.

In this case the plaintiff sues the defendant on 18 coupons, of $80 each, detached from bonds 6, 7, and 8, of $1,000 each, issued by Nolan county on or about April 10, 1882, and delivered to Martin, Byrne & Johnson. Plaintiff also sues, in this case on 24 coupons, of $80 each, detached from bonds 1, 2, 3, and 4, issued by Nolan county, and delivered to Mathews &amp Whitaker, each of said bonds calling for $1,000, and dated April 10, 1882. Plaintiff also sues on 18 coupons, of $80 each, detached from bonds 24, 25, and 26, for $1,000 each issued by Nolan county on June 21, 1882, and delivered to Wernse & Diechman. Plaintiff also sues on 6 coupons of $80 each detached from bond No. 27, issued by Nolan county, dated June 21, 1882, for the sum of $1,000, and delivered to Flippen, Adoue & Lobit.

The defendant answered by a general denial, and further pleads that, before any of said bonds were executed or delivered, defendant had already created, and there were then existing and outstanding against it, other debts fully equal to its lawful power to make debts. Defendant charges that, among the debts so existing and outstanding against it, are four bonds, of $1,000 each, issued on the 5th day of April, 1882, to Martin, Byrne & Johnson, numbers 1 to 4, inclusive, and now owned by the state of Texas, and five bonds, for the sum of $1,000 each, numbered 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14, referred to in the orders of the commissioners' court of said county, of the dates February 18, 1882, March 22, 1882, and April 15, 1882, and that said five bonds are now owned by the state of Texas. That all of said nine bonds were void in their inception, but they were validated from their original issue, in favor of the state of Texas, by the act of the legislature of said state approved the 25th day of May, 1885. Then defendant says the total assessed value of its taxable property, as shown by its assessment rolls, was as follows: For the year 1881, $361,770; for the year 1882, $908,276; for 1883, $1,684,615; for 1884, $1,953,755; for 1885, $1,855,278.

2. A jury was waived. The agreed statement of facts in this case is as follows:

'Quaker City National Nank v. Nolan County.
'Now comes the Quaker City National Bank, plaintiff, by Williams & Butts, its attorneys, and Nolan county, defendant, by Leake, Henry, Miller & Reeves and Cowan & Fisher, its attorneys, and, for the purpose of a trial of the above-stated cause, agree to the following facts, to wit:
'(1) The county of Nolan, defendant, was organized in January, (10th,) 1881, and thereupon became, and ever since hath remained, and still is, a body corporate and politic, and the first term of its commissioners' court was held on the 28th day of January, 1881.
'(2) The total assessed value of property, as assessed for the county of Nolan for the year 1881, was $361,770.00; for the year 1882, $908,276.00; for the year 1883, $1,684,615.00; for the year 1884, $1,953,755.00; for the year 1885, $1,855,278.00; for the year 1886, $1,756,814.00; and for the year 1887, $1,757,061.00.
'(3) By statute law, in force in Texas from 1876 to the present time, the assessment of all property for taxation in the several counties is required to be made by the assessor between the 1st day of January and the 1st day of June of the current year, with reference to the quantity held or owned on the 1st day of January in the year for which the property is required to be listed or rendered. The assessor is required to submit all lists of property rendered to him prior to the first Monday in June to the board of equalization, which is composed of the county commissioners' court of his county, on the first Monday in June, or as soon thereafter as practicable, for their inspection, approval, and correction, or equalization, and, after that board shall have returned the approved lists to the assessor, he shall then make out his rolls in triplicate, one of which is required to be filed in the county clerk's office, and one in the office of the state comptroller, and one to be delivered to the county collector, which must be done on or before the 1st day of October of the year, if possible, at which time the collection of taxes begins.
'(4) On February 14, 1881, the county commissioners' court of Nolan county entered an order of record, levying a tax of one-fourth of one per centum for courthouse purposes, and a tax of one-fourth of one per centum for jail purposes. At this time Nolan county owed no courthouse debt.
'(5) On May 11, 1881, the county commissioners' court of Nolan county ordered that bids to build a jail, to cost not exceeding $10,000.00, be advertised for. On May 11, 1881, the county commissioners' court advertised for bids to build a jail, not to exceed in cost $10,000.00; and on June 14, 1881, plans of Martin, Byrne & Johnson for the said jail were adopted, and contract awarded them, at a cost of $8,755.00, to be paid in coupon bonds of the county, and, on October 4, 1881, a committee was appointed by the county commissioners' court of Nolan county to see that the contract for jail and courthouse combined was properly carried out.
'(6) On April 5, 1882, an order was entered on the minutes of the county commissioners' court, receiving the jail, as built by Martin, Byrne & Johnson, and authorizing the county judge (who was Wm. Barnett) to receive the keys and settle for the same. Some time after this, about April 10, 1882, Wm. Barnett, as county judge, and W. C. Johnson, as county clerk, issued nine bonds in the name of said county, eight of them for the sum of one thousand dollars, and the other for the sum of seven hundred and fifty-five dollars, and delivered the said bonds to the contractors, Martin, Byrne & Johnson, in payment for the said jail. There is no order on the minutes of the commissioners' court of said county, authorizing the county judge and county clerk, or any one else, to issue and deliver the said bonds, unless the above, in connection with the orders mentioned in the fifth clause of this agreement, is construed to be such authority, which is a question left open, to be decided by the court on the trial of this cause. The bonds first mentioned in plaintiff's petition as numbers 6, 7, and 8, being three of these bonds. Following is a copy of one of said bonds, all of which are of the same tenor and effect, and contain the same recitals, save as to amount, date, time of maturity, and serial number:
"United States of America.
"No. 5.
$1,000.00.
"Courthouse Coupon Bond.
"Nolan County, State of Texas.
"Know all men by these presents, that the county of Nolan, in the state of Texas, acknowledges itself indebted unto Martin, Byrne & Johnson, or bearer, in the sum of one thousand dollars lawful money of the United States of America, which sum the said county promises to pay, for value received, at Sweetwater, Nolan county, Texas, ten years after the date hereof, but redeemable at any time at the pleasure of said county, together with interest thereon at the rate of eight per centum per annum, payable annually, on the 10th day of April in each year, on presentation and surrender of coupons hereto attached, as they severally become due and payable. This bond is issued in accordance with the provisions of an act of the legislature of the state of Texas, entitled 'An act authorizing the county commissioners' court of the several counties of this state to issue bonds for the erection of a courthouse, and to levy a tax to pay for the same,' approved February 21st, 1879.
"In testimony whereof, I hereunto affix my official signature, and official seal of said county, at Sweetwater, Texas, this the 1st day of December, A. D. 1881.
William Barnett,
"Judge County Court, Nolan County, Texas.
"[Seal of Commissioners' Court.]
"Countersigned:
"W. C. Johnson, Clerk County Court, Nolan County, Texas.
"Registered 10th day of January, A. D. 1882.
"J. H. Fowler, County Treasurer, Nolan County Texas.'
'(7) On February 18, 1882, the county commissioners' court of Nolan county entered an order of record that a courthouse should be built at the county seat, during the year 1882, at a cost of not less than $20,000.00, and that $20,000.00, in 15-year coupon bonds, bearing interest at the rate of eight per centum per annum, be issued, and at once sold, and the proceeds applied to the building of the courthouse, said bonds to be redeemable at the pleasure of the county at any time after ten years from date, and J. W. Posey was appointed the agent of the county to sell said bonds at a commission of ten per cent. for his services, which commissions were to cover all costs of lithographing and disposing of said bonds.
'(8) On March 29, 1882, it was ordered by said court that the cost of the courthouse should not exceed $23,000.00, and said Posey was continued as the agent of the county to sell the bonds, authorized to fill in the blank spaces with the names of the purchasers, and ten per cent. commissions awarded him, which commissions were to cover all discounts and cost of selling, as well as preparing, the bonds. On April 15, 1882, the county commissioners' court amended the order of February 18, 1882, so as to make the bonds redeemable at the pleasure of the county at any time after ten years, which redeemable clause has been interlined in the previous order also. The $20,000.00 15-year, 8 per cent. coupon bonds, that had been printed under the original order, were returned and destroyed, and it was ordered that 20 8 per cent. coupon bonds, of $1,000.00 each, be lithographed and substituted
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Weinberger v. Board of Public Instruction of St. Johns County
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • March 10, 1927
    ... ... In smith ... v. Mayor, etc., of the City of Dublin, 113 Ga. 833, 39 S.E ... 327, referred to in ... City National Bank, 15 Tex.Civ.App. 172, 39 S.W. 628, ... reversed on other ... enactment or adjudication to the contrary. See Quaker ... City Nat. Bank v. Nolan County (C. C.) 59 F. 660; 37 ... ...
  • Edwards v. Lesueur, Secretary of State
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 5, 1896
    ... ... 39; In Matter of Oliver Lee & Co.'s Bank, 21 ... N.Y. 9. (3) The constitution of this ... seat of government at Jefferson city. The first constitution ... delegated to the ... Lynch, 65 Tex ... 149; Adams v. County of Logan, 11 Ill. 336; ... Harris v. Shaw, 13 ... ...
  • State ex rel. Budge v. Snyder
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • November 8, 1923
    ... ... , involving the organization of Teton County ... Writ ... Haggard ... Norris, 25 O. St. 308; Quaker City Bank v ... County, 59 F. 660; The ... ...
  • Barr v. City of Philadelphia
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • May 15, 1899
    ...166 Pa. 152; Rainsburg Borough v. Fyan, 127 Pa. 74; John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. City of Huron, 80 F. 652; Quaker City Nat. Bank v. Nolan County, 59 F. 660; Citizens' Bank v. City of Terrell, 78 Texas, James Alcorn, assistant city solicitor, with him Ernest Lowengrund, and John L. Kin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT