Queets Band of Indians v. State of Wash., s. 83-3644

Citation714 F.2d 1008
Decision Date02 September 1983
Docket Number83-3646,Nos. 83-3644,s. 83-3644
PartiesQUEETS BAND OF INDIANS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The STATE OF WASHINGTON et al., Defendants-Appellants. MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Carl Ullman, Michael P. O'Connell, Taholah, Wash., for defendants-appellants.

Timothy R. Malone, Olympia, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.

Before WRIGHT, SKOPIL and POOLE, Circuit Judges.

The district court permanently enjoined the state from enforcing its motor vehicle licensing and registration requirements on vehicles licensed and registered by the appellee tribes, reasoning that each tribe was a "jurisdiction" as defined in Wash.Rev.Code § 46.85.020(2), for the purposes of reciprocal immunity from these requirements as provided in Wash.Rev.Code § 46.85.080. On appeal, we grant the state's motion to have this question of local law certified to the Washington Supreme Court for consideration.

FACTS

The Quinault Indian Nation (Queets) and the Muckleshoot Band of Indians (Muckleshoots) are federally recognized tribes that govern reservations within the boundaries of Washington. In 1974 the Queets requested the state to issue state license plates for tribal vehicles at the nominal fee provided for vehicles of state agencies and local governments. When the state refused, the Queets adopted its own licensing and registration system. The Muckleshoots enacted their Motor Vehicle Licensing Ordinance in 1977.

The tribal statutes authorize registration and licensing only for tribal government service vehicles. License plates are standard size, consecutively numbered and bear identifying tribal legends. Registration forms are carried in each vehicle and are on file with the respective tribes and with the Washington Department of Licensing. The tribal statutes provide for automatic reciprocity within the reservations for vehicles registered and licensed in other jurisdictions if the other jurisdiction affords similar reciprocity.

The Queets brought suit shortly after a tribal garbage truck carrying tribal plates and operating on a federal highway within the reservation was cited for not displaying a valid state license. The parties agreed to a preliminary injunction prohibiting the state from interfering with the operation of tribally licensed vehicles.

The Muckleshoots filed their lawsuit after the state informed the tribe that it would not recognize tribal license plates. The parties agreed to the same preliminary injunction.

During the course of litigation, various issues were raised and then dropped by reason of intervening decisions and by stipulation between the parties. The only issue remaining is the applicability of Washington's reciprocity statute. The district court held that the tribally licensed vehicles were statutorily exempt from Washington's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Queets Band of Indians v. State of Wash.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 17 d3 Julho d3 1985
    ...to include Indian tribes as jurisdictions eligible for vehicle registration and licensing reciprocity. Queets Band of Indians v. State of Washington, 714 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir.1983). The Washington Supreme Court, in a divided opinion, concluded that the relevant statutes were not intended to i......
  • Complaint of McLinn
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 3 d3 Outubro d3 1984
    ...circuit has used the certification procedure but has not articulated its standards for doing so. See Queets Band of Indians v. State of Washington, 714 F.2d 1008, 1009 (9th Cir.1983); Estate of Madsen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 659 F.2d 897, 899 (9th Cir.1981); Mutschler v. People......
  • Queets Band of Indians v. State
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 14 d4 Junho d4 1984
    ...embodied in RCW 46.85.020(2), encompass Indian Tribes recognized as such by the United States government? Queets Band of Indians v. State, 714 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir.1983). RAP 16.16(a). We answer "no" and hold Indian Tribes are not entitled to reciprocity under RCW Respondents, the Queets Band......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT