R.C. v. State

Decision Date11 February 2015
Docket Number4D13–508,4D13–1466.,Nos. 4D13–341,4D13–509,s. 4D13–341
Citation157 So.3d 458 (Mem)
PartiesR.C., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Monique Rolla, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A juvenile appeals an order adjudicating him delinquent after his plea of no contest to multiple charges. Although not requested at the plea or disposition hearing, a subsequent order recites that appellant had preserved the right to appeal the prior order finding him competent to proceed in all of his cases. It does not state that the order was dispositive. Indeed, an order finding a defendant competent to proceed is not a dispositive order. See Fuller v. State, 748 So.2d 292, 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (an issue is dispositive only when, regardless of the outcome of the appeal, there will be no trial; an order determining defendant competent has no such effect, as trial proceeds). In Burns v. State, 884 So.2d 1010, 1012–13 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), we explained that a competency issue relates to the voluntary and intelligent nature of a plea, which is among the limited issues which may be appealed from a plea, but not without moving to withdraw the plea first. We have applied this preservation rule to juvenile proceedings in P.R.T. v. State, 920 So.2d 708, 709 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) citing State v. T.G., 800 So.2d 204, 210 (Fla.2001) ([J]uveniles pleading guilty ... may directly appeal an involuntary plea only if it is preserved by a motion to withdraw plea in the trial court.”). As appellant failed to file a motion to withdraw his plea, he has not preserved the issue for review.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Dortch v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 4 Abril 2018
    ...See, e.g. , Bain v. State , 211 So.3d 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ; Williams v. State , 178 So.3d 531 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; R.C. v. State , 157 So.3d 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; Burns v. State , 884 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Depending on the facts, procedural posture, and arguments made, ou......
  • Kearns v. Farmer Acquisition Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 11 Febrero 2015
    ... ... FWA it provides that [l]aw, rule, or regulation includes any statute or ordinance or any rule or regulation adopted pursuant to any federal, state, or local statute or ordinance applicable to the employer and pertaining to the business. 448.101(4). Thus, it must be a legislatively enacted law, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT