R. & J. Dick Company v. Blue Trap Rock Company
Decision Date | 13 March 1922 |
Docket Number | 229 |
Citation | 238 S.W. 609,152 Ark. 465 |
Parties | R. & J. DICK COMPANY v. BLUE TRAP ROCK COMPANY |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Third Division; Archie F. House Judge; affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Emerson Donham & Shepherd, for appellant.
The court erred in refusing to hold that Fulton and appellee were partners, and that their agreement as well as their dealings with third parties constitued such a relation. 44 Ark. 423; 80 Ark. 29. An agreement may constitute a partnership as to third parties, when it creates no such relation between the parties themselves. 2 Ark. 354. Partnership may be proved by circumstantial evidence. 5 Ark. 61; 32 Ark. 740; 145 U.S 611; 63 Ark. 518; 93 Ark. 524.
Appellee is estopped by its own conduct to deny the partnership as it acted in such manner as to mislead third parties. 29 Ark. 512; 80 Ark. 23; 95 Ark. 1; 32 Ark. 733.
The belt, when installed, became a fixture and a part of the realty and is not removable as personal property. 73 Ark. 227; 120 Ark. 252; 119 F. 438; 128 F. 355; C. & M. Dig., sec. 6906; 63 Ark. 369.
Appellant instituted suit against appellee in the Pulaski Circuit Court to recover $ 541.40, the sale price of 85 feet of machine belting which it is alleged appellant sold to George R. Fulton and appellee, and which was attached by George R. Fulton as a part of the machinery constituting a rock plant owned by appellee. Appellant sought to hold appellee liable as a partner of George R. Fulton, who ordered and received the belting from appellant and attached same to said machinery. Appellee filed an answer denying the indebtedness, and the case proceeded to a trial before the court, sitting as a jury, upon evidence responsive to the issue joined, as to whether George R. Fulton and appellee were partners in the operation of the rock plant belonging to appellee at the time the belting was purchased and attached to the machinery. The belting was ordered during the operation of the rock plant by George R. Fulton, under the following contract (omitting formal parts):
To continue reading
Request your trial- Collier Commission Company v. Wright
- Lashbrook v. Tri-County Highway Improvement District
-
Stone v. Riggs
...Participation in the profits of a business does not necessarily create a partnership interest in the business. 137 Ark. 80; 138 Ark. 281; 152 Ark. 465. order to constitute a partnership, the parties must have joined or associated themselves together to carry on a trade or undertaking for th......
-
R. & J. Dick Co. v. Blue Trap Rock Co.
... 238 S.W. 609 R. & J. DICK BLUE TRAP ROCK CO. (No. 229.) Supreme Court of Arkansas. March 13, 1922. Appeal from Circuit Court, Pulaski County; A. F. House, Judge. Suit by the R. & J. Dick Company against the Blue Trap Rock Company. Judgment for defendant, and the plaintiff appeals. Affirmed......