R.L.F. v. State, Case No. 2D16–4255
Decision Date | 04 October 2017 |
Docket Number | Case No. 2D16–4255 |
Citation | 228 So.3d 633 (Mem) |
Parties | R.L.F., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Carol J. Y. Wilson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
In this Anders 1 appeal, R.L.F. appeals from a disposition order finding that he committed delinquent acts, withholding adjudication of delinquency, and placing him on juvenile probation until the age of nineteen with special conditions. We affirm in all respects but note that a possible sentencing error may exist in the actual disposition order.
The disposition order reflects that the trial court imposed a total of $200 in costs and fees, whereas the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence imposed a total of $150 in "court costs." See W.S.G. v. State, 32 So.3d 725, 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) . However, because R.L.F. failed to preserve this potential error by filing a motion to correct sentencing error, this court must affirm. See Thomas v. State, 190 So.3d 222, 223 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) ( ). Our affirmance is without prejudice for R.L.F. to raise this possible sentencing error in an appropriate postconviction motion. See id.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mace v. M&T Bank
... ... M&T BANK, Appellee. Case No. 2D16-3381 District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District ... State , 397 So. 2d 1120, 1123 (Fla. 1981) )). We have explained that evidence is ... ...
-
Roop v. State
... 228 So.3d 633 Devin Gregory ROOP, DOC #C06445, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Case No. 2D151573 District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. Opinion filed October 4, 2017 ... ...
-
Leombruno v. State
...to preserve this potential error by objecting or filing a motion to correct sentencing error, we must affirm. See R.L.F. v. State, 228 So. 3d 633, 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (affirming without prejudice where the defendant failed to properly preserve the sentencing error). Our affirmance is wit......