Racetrac Petroleum v. Delco Oil, Inc., 97-3535.
Decision Date | 06 November 1998 |
Docket Number | No. 97-3535.,97-3535. |
Parties | RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC., Appellant, v. DELCO OIL, INC., Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Henry M. Coxe, III, John A. DeVault, III, and Allan F. Brooke II of Bedell, Dittmar, DeVault, Pillans & Coxe, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
J. Michael Huey, Geoffrey B. Schwartz, and George W. Hatch of Huey, Guilday & Tucker, P.A., Tallahassee, and Darren J. Elkind of James, Zimmerman, Paul & Huddleston, Deltona, for Appellee.
Delco Oil, Inc., filed a complaint against Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., (Racetrac) seeking damages and injunctive relief, alleging that Racetrac was violating Florida's Motor Fuel Marketing Practices Act (the Act)1 by engaging in predatory pricing and selling motor fuel below nonrefiner cost. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the trial court entered a nonfinal temporary injunction prohibiting Racetrac from selling motor fuel below the nonrefiner cost and setting a minimum price for which Racetrac may sell its fuel. Racetrac appeals, arguing the trial court erred in interpreting the meaning of the term "competition" in the Act and in weighing the hardship imposed on the parties by the issuance of a temporary injunction. We disagree and affirm the trial court's temporary injunction.
Racetrac's claims of error focus on the trial court's interpretation of two provisions contained in the Act. In reviewing this appeal we recognize first that judicial interpretation of Florida statutes is a purely legal matter and therefore subject to de novo review. See Operation Rescue v. Women's Health Center, Inc., 626 So.2d 664, 670 (Fla. 1993),
aff'd in part, rev'd in part on other grounds, 512 U.S. 753, 114 S.Ct. 2516, 129 L.Ed.2d 593 (1994). We recognize further that "`the primary and overriding consideration in statutory interpretation is that a statute should be construed and applied so as to give effect to the evident intent of the legislature.'" Deason v. Florida Dep't of Corrections, 705 So.2d 1374, 1375 (Fla.1998)(quoting State v. Nunez, 368 So.2d 422, 423-24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)).
The first provision at issue is subsection 526.304(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), which provides: "It is unlawful for any nonrefiner engaged in commerce in this state to sell any grade or quality of motor fuel at a retail outlet below nonrefiner cost, where the effect is to injure competition." Racetrac contends the trial court erred in concluding that proof of injury to Delco alone constituted injury to "competition" within the meaning of this subsection, arguing that our legislature intended to enforce the prohibition against below-cost motor fuel pricing only when it affects "competition as a whole." However, "competition" is defined in subsection 526.303(2), Florida Statutes (1995), as "the vying for motor fuel sales between any two sellers in the same relevant geographic market." As a result, the trial court correctly determined that proof of injury to Delco alone constituted injury to "competition" within the meaning of subsection 526.304(1)(b), since the definition of "competition" specifically pertains to sales between "any two sellers." § 526.303(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). Where the legislature has used particular words to define a term, we do not have the authority to redefine it. See Baker v. State, 636 So.2d 1342, 1343-44 (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
NJN Sys., Inc. v. Sunoco, Inc.
...8, 53).2 The corporate Sunoco stations at issue are designated with store numbers 2736 and 2738.3 In Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. v. Delco Oil, Inc., 721 So.2d 376, 377 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1998) the court held that proof of injury to one competitor may suffice to constitute damage to “competition”......
-
State Price Discrimination Law
...171. See, e.g. , State ex rel. Galanos v. Mapco Petroleum, 519 So. 2d 1275, 1286 (Ala. 1987); Racetrac Petroleum v. Delco Oil, 721 So. 2d 376, 377-78 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998) (“However, ‘competition’ is defined in sub section 526.303(2), Florida Statutes (1995), as ‘the vying for motor fu......
-
Table of Cases
...149, 150 R.L. Jordan Oil Co. of North Carolina v. Boardman Petroleum, 353 F.3d 334 (4th Cir. 2003), 148 Racetrac Petroleum v. Delco Oil, 721 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998), 139 Rangen v. Sterling Nelson & Sons, 351 F.2d 851 (9th Cir. 1965), 57 Raynor Mfg. Co. v. Raynor Door Co., 2009......