Rachel v. Com.
Decision Date | 25 April 1975 |
Citation | 523 S.W.2d 395 |
Parties | Danny Gale RACHEL, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky |
Anthony M. Wilhoit, Public Defender, J. Vincent Aprile, Asst. Public Defenders, Frankfort, for appellant.
Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., Patrick B. Kimberlin, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.
VANCE, Commissioner.
The appellant, Danny Gale Rachel, was indicted jointly with George Bishop Boggs for the murder of Mack Trent, Jr. They were tried jointly. Rachel was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and sentenced to eighteen years' imprisonment. Boggs was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. They have prosecuted separate appeals relying principally upon the same allegations of error.
Rachel and Boggs were arrested in Cumberland, Kentucky, when an automobile driven by Boggs ran into the side of a building. Boggs was drunk at the time.
Several hours after the arrest Rachel informed the jailer that he believed that he and Boggs killed a man the night before. The jailer informed the sheriff of this fact and the sheriff examined Rachel at the county jail. The sheriff gave the following testimony concerning Rachel's statement:
'A. Mr. Rachel, he started telling me that him and another boy from over in Perry County had went down to Lightning's place, a beer joint at Jeff, and this boy was with him. At that time he couldn't tell me his name. He couldn't remember his name, and I asked him his name, but he referred to him as this boy with him. Said he went in back of the dance hall of Lightning's place and bought some grass, which we refer to it maybe as marijuana or grass, and he referred to it as grass, came back out into the car and they smoked a cigarette or two of this grass and they they left there and went down to Hazard and bought some gas and maybe some oil. I don't remember now where they said oil or not, but anyway, he did say some gas, and came back and above Lightning's place there at Jeff this fellow was hitchhiking. They stopped and picked him up and he asked them to him to Cumberland, Kentucky and he said they told him they would if he would buy them some gas. And he said, 'I will,' he would buy them some gas. So he said they came down through . . .. Just one minute, now. Did he identify that hitchhiker that they picked up?
'A. No, he said he didn't know his name. I asked him did he know who he was. He said he didn't.
'24. All right, go ahead.
'A. He said they came on up through Whitesburg and along up the road somewhere along the line, why, the fellow said he had a gun under his belt, and they came on to Whitesburg, up on the maountain. And I asked him, I said, 'Well, do you know where this Weber's Sausage place is?' And they said, 'No, we don't know, and we didn't recognize it or pay any attention to it as we came by, but we did come up a steep part of the mountain and it leveled off, and we came out a little ways and pulled off the right side of the road and me and this boy driver got out of the car, went around to the back,' and then the boy that was driving got back in the car before he did. And when he came back to the car this fellow they had in the back, which later we learned his name was Boggs, had a rag or something around his neck choking him, and he asked him what he was doing and he said 'Shut up or I'll kill you, too.' Then he said Boggs took the Trent boy--which we later found his name--out of the car and rolled him over the bank, but while he was rolling him over the bank he jumped in the car and started it and tried to put it in gear, just started it, and Boggs came back and got in the car with him and they came on towards Cumberland, or went on towards Cumberland. On the other side of the mountain the Boggs boy told him to stop and let him drive, and the Boggs boy, he started driving at that point and drove on into Cumberland, and there in Cumberland they run into a building or backed into a building and then was picked up by the city police, deposited there and lodged in jail in Cumberland.
Rachel later was interrogated by a state detective and signed the following written statement:
'A. My name is Danny Gale Rachel. I'm 19 years old and attended school through the 8th grade. I give this statement to Detective M. J. Harrison and Trooper Ronnie Jarvis, known by me to be members of the Kentucky State Police, and present also is Harlan County Sheriff Walden Holbrook. I am giving this statement free and voluntarily, without any threats or promises having been made toward me. I have had a statement of my rights read to me and I understand these rights.
'Me and Mack Trent, Jr. were down at Lightning's at the beer joint . Mack went into the back of the place where they dance and bought some grass. We left and went riding around and smoked the grass. We went to Hazard and got some gas and two quarts of oil and came back above Lightning's and picked up this man who was hitchhiking. I didn't know him then but I now know his last name is Boggs. It was about 11 to 11:30 when we picked him up, and Boggs asked us to take him to Cumberland. We came through Whitesburg and across the mountain on U.S. 119. Boggs kept talking about having a gun in his belt, and Boggs told Trent to pull off at the next wide place. And he pulled off the road and I got out and Trent got out and got back in the car first. I walked around the car to the door and Boggs had a piece of cloth around Trent's neck choking him, and when Boggs turned him loose he went limp. I said, 'What are you doing?' and Boggs said, 'Shut up or I'll kill you.' Boggs then got Trent out of the car and rolled him over the hill. I jumped in the car and started the car up. I was trying to get the car in gear but before I could get started Boggs got back in the car. He told me to go to Cumberland and I started driving fast, and before we got off the mountain Boggs told me to pull over and let him drive. I was going to wreck the car and try to get away. Boggs drove on into Cumberland and ran the car into the back door of the hardware store. He backed out and the police stopped us in front of the police station. Before the choking took place Trent was driving, I was sitting in the right front and Boggs was sitting in the left rear. There had been no fuss or argument prior to the choking. We were all drinking and me and Trent had smoked about five joints of pot.
'I have read my statement consisting of two pages, and it is true to the best of my knowledge.
'/s/ Danny G. Rachel
'7/21/73'
Boggs was interrogated by the state detective and signed a written statement acknowledging that he choked the deceased and that 'Rachel held his hands'. The court directed that that portion of Boggs' statement referring to the fact that 'Rachel held his hands' be deleted. When read to the jury, Boggs' statement was as follows:
'I have read my statement, consisting of one page, and it is true to the best of my knowledge.
'/s/ George Boggs
'Date: July 21, 1973'
Both Rachel and Boggs moved for separate trials on the grounds that they would be prejudiced on a joint trial because their defenses were antagonistic. Neither Rachel nor Boggs testified. Boggs' counsel sought to exonerate him on the grounds that he was drunk and did not have a premediated intent to kill. Rachel's counsel argued to the jury that the only evidence against Rachel was the testimony of the sheriff as to Rachel's admission but that this admission was made by Rachel only because he was afraid of Boggs as he later claimed in his statement to the state detective.
Prior to the adoption of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Foster v. Com.
...defendant tends directly to incriminate the other." Tinsley v. Commonwealth, Ky., 495 S.W.2d 776, 780 (1973); See also Rachel v. Commonwealth, Ky., 523 S.W.2d 395 (1975). "There is a strong policy in favor of joint trials when charges will be proved by the same series of acts ..." United St......
-
Murray v. Commonwealth
...881 (Ky.1981)). 15.Id. See also Sherley v. Commonwealth, 889 S.W.2d 794 (Ky.1994). 16.Wilson, 695 S.W.2d at 858 (citing Rachel v. Commonwealth, 523 S.W.2d 395 (Ky.1975)). 17.Peacher v. Commonwealth, 391 S.W.3d 821 (Ky.2013). 18.Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). 19.Rearick v. Commonwea......
-
Wilson v. Com.
...Epperson and Hodge v. Commonwealth, Ky., 809 S.W.2d 835 (1991); Wilson v. Commonwealth, Ky., 695 S.W.2d 854 (1985); Rachel v. Commonwealth, Ky., 523 S.W.2d 395 (1975). A defendant must show that antagonism prevented a jury from being able to separate and treat distinctively evidence that is......
-
Webb v. Commonwealth
...Commonwealth, 391 S.W.3d 821, 834 (Ky. 2013) (citing Quisenberry v. Commonwealth, 336 S.W.3d 19 (Ky.2011)); see also Rachel v. Commonwealth, 523 S.W.2d 395, 400 (Ky. 1975) ("If upon the consideration of the case a trial judge orders a joint trial, we cannot reverse unless we are clearly con......