Rafferty v. Police Commissioner of Boston
| Decision Date | 05 April 1927 |
| Parties | HARRY W. RAFFERTY v. POLICE COMMISSIONER OF BOSTON. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
March 16, 1927.
Present: RUGG, C.
License. Boston Police commissioner.
Certiorari.
Under Sts. 1906, c 291, Section 10; 1909, c. 221, the police commissioner of the city of Boston has power, without notice or hearing, to suspend and make inoperative for an indefinite period a hackney carriage license, previously granted by him, stating as the ground for his action refusal by the licensee to obey lawful orders of a police officer and a report that the licensee had been "skinning" contrary to warnings by
officers. Following Burgess v.
Mayor & Aldermen of Brockton, 235 Mass.
95.
Whether a petition for a writ of certiorari was the proper remedy to be resorted to by the licensee to review the action of the commissioner above described was not determined.
PETITION, described in the opinion, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court for the county of Suffolk on November 11, 1926, for a writ of certiorari.
The petition was heard by Wait, J., who ordered it dismissed. The petitioner alleged exceptions.
W.N. Osgood, (R Swartz with him,) for the petitioner.
H. Parker, (E.
H.Hewitt with him,) for the respondent.
RUGG, C.J. This is a petition for a writ of certiorari. Its object is to quash the suspension of several licenses granted by the respondent to the petitioner on July 1, 1926, to drive hackney carriages. The return of the respondent shows that such licenses on October 21, 1926, were suspended and made inoperative for an indefinite period without hearing, because of refusal by the petitioner to obey lawful orders of a police officer, and because it had been reported that the petitioner had been "skinning" contrary to warnings by officers. Notice thereof was given on that day to the petitioner.
The power is conferred upon the respondent by St. 1906, c. 291, Section 10, St. 1909, c. 221, to grant such licenses and to suspend and make inoperative the same for such period as he may think proper "for any cause deemed satisfactory to him and without a hearing."
If it be assumed in favor of the petitioner that certiorari is an appropriate remedy, but without so deciding, it is plain that he is not entitled to relief. The stated grounds for revocation of the licenses appear reasonable. There is nothing to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Woodbury v. Mun. Council of Gloucester
...who was empoweredto revoke ‘for any cause deemed satisfactory to him and without a hearing’ was upheld in Rafferty v. Police Commissioner of Boston, 259 Mass. 145, 146, 156 N.E. 28, only because ‘There is nothing to betoken the exercise of arbitrary power by the respondent.’ Jones v. Opelik......
-
Fallon v. Bd. of St. Com'rs of Boston
...v. Borden, 163 Mass. 470, 40 N.E. 859;Burgess v. Mayor & Aldermen of Brockton, 235 Mass. 95, 126 N.E. 456;Rafferty v. Police Commissioner of Boston, 259 Mass. 145, 156 N.E. 28;Morley v. Police Commissioner of Boston, 261 Mass. 269, 159 N.E. 41. The acceptance of the license by the petitione......
-
Woodbury v. Municipal Council of Gloucester
... ... 241 Mass. 400 ... Anderson v. Kopelman, 279 Mass. 140 ... Bern v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co. 310 Mass. 651 ... The license to construct and ... of Boston, 242 Mass. 194 ... Brett v. Building ... Commissioner of Brookline, 250 Mass. 73 , 79 ... McPherson v. Street Commissioners of ... to him and without a hearing" was upheld in Rafferty ... v. Police Commissioner of Boston, 259 Mass. 145 , 146, ... only ... ...
-
Sullivan v. Police Com'r of City of Boston
...of Boston, 261 Mass. 269, 276, 159 N.E. 41;Commonwealth v. Rice, 261 Mass. 340, 158 N.E. 797, 55 A.L.R. 1128;Rafferty v. Police Commissioner of Boston, 259 Mass. 145, 156 N.E. 28; Burrell v. Checker Taxi Co., 287 Mass. 108, 191 N.E. 400. The establishment of special taxi stands, adjoining r......