Raghubir v. State
Decision Date | 11 June 2018 |
Docket Number | CASE NO.: SC18–825 |
Citation | 252 So.3d 692 (Mem) |
Parties | Vinodh M. RAGHUBIR, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s) |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby dismissed because petitioner raises the same issues as in Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-714, 2018 WL 2230720 , in which the petition was transferred to the district court.
This Court hereby expressly retains jurisdiction to pursue any possible sanctions against petitioner. See generally Fla. R. App. P. 9.410(a).
Since 2017, petitioner has filed twenty-one other petitions or notices with the Court. To date, the Court has transferred, dismissed, or denied thirteen of petitioner's filings. See Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-712, 2018 WL 2427620 ( ); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-713, 2018 WL 2427621 ( mandamus petition); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-716, 2018 WL 2427623 ( ); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-526, 2018 WL 2318094 ( ); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-704, 2018 WL 2324303 (denying prohibition petition); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-711, 2018 WL 2230478 ( ); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-714, 2018 WL 2230720 ( ); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-705, 2018 WL 2192456 ( ); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-599, 2018 WL 1877778 (Fla. April 19, 2018) ( ); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-252, 2018 WL 1151801 (Fla. Mar. 5, 2018) ( ); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-228, 2018 WL 818074 (Fla. Feb. 12, 2018) ( ); Raghubir v. State, No. SC18-234, 2018 WL 824220 (Fla. Feb. 12, 2018) ( ); Raghubir v. Jones, No. SC17-893, 2017 WL 2481489 (Fla. June 8, 2017) ( ).
This Court has chosen to sanction pro se petitioners who have abused the judicial process and otherwise misused this Court's limited judicial resources by filing frivolous, non-meritorious, or otherwise inappropriate filings. Such petitioners have been barred from initiating further proceedings in this Court unless their pleadings, motions, or other requests for relief were filed under the signature of a member of The Florida Bar in good standing. See, e.g., Desue v. Jones, 213 So.3d 801 (Fla. 2017); Steele v. State, 14 So.3d 221 (Fla. 2009); Pettway v. McNeil, 987 So.2d 20 (Fla. 2008).
It appearing that petitioner has abused the judicial process by filing numerous pro se filings in this Court that are either meritless or not appropriate for this Court's review, the Court now takes action. Therefore, Vinodh M. Raghubir is hereby directed to show cause on or before June 28, 2018, why he should not be barred from filing any pleadings, motions, or other requests for relief in this Court related to circuit and district court case numbers 482016CF001833000AOX,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re J.L.S., CASE NO.: SC18-1356
...of probable cause by The Florida Bar as to conduct of the Applicant committed during the period of probation may terminate the probation 252 So.3d 692and subject the Applicant to all available grievance procedures and disciplinary sanctions including disbarment under the Rules of Discipline......
-
Raghubir v. State
...to circuit and district court case numbers 482016CF001833000AOX, 482016CF005231000AOX, 5D17-3644, and 5D17-912. See Raghubir v. State , 252 So.3d 692 (Fla. 2018). We now find that Raghubir has failed to show cause why he should not be barred, and we sanction him as set forth below.In Ninth ......