Raia Industries, Inc. v. Young
| Decision Date | 17 November 1986 |
| Citation | 124 A.D.2d 722,508 N.Y.S.2d 228 |
| Parties | RAIA INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant, v. Christine A. YOUNG, d/b/a Empire Paving Co., Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Kleinman & Saltzman, P.C., New City (Lester A. Levin, of counsel), for appellant.
Murphy and Bennett, Newburgh (Thomas J. Murphy, of counsel), for respondent.
Before THOMPSON, J.P., and WEINSTEIN, NIEHOFF and SPATT, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover the balance due for goods sold and delivered, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.), dated October 17, 1985, which denied its motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The proponent of a motion for summary judgment is required to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, offering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case. The failure to make such a showing requires the denial of the motion, regardless of the insufficiency of the opposing papers (see, Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642; Royal v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 122 A.D.2d 132, 504 N.Y.S.2d 519). Here, the plaintiff has failed to make the necessary prima facie showing.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hecht v. Vanderbilt Associates
...the opposing papers ( see, Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642; Raia Indus. v. Young, 124 A.D.2d 722, 508 N.Y.S.2d 228; Royal v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 122 A.D.2d 132, 504 N.Y.S.2d 519). Here, the movants, by appending copies of the lease......
-
Anthony v. Highlands Country Club, Garrison Props. LLC
...papers (see, Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851 ; Royal v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 122 A.D.2d 132 ; Raia Indus. v. Young, 124 A.D.2d 722 )." (Fox v. Wyeth Labs, 129 A.D.2d 611 [2d Dept 1987] ).Here, there is no evidence that defendants created the alleged condition or pro......
-
Donatin v. Sea Crest Trading Co., Inc.
...v. New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 NY2d 851 [487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642]; Royal v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 122 AD2d 132 ; Raia Indus. v. Young, 124 AD2d 722 " ( Fox v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 129 A.D.2d 611, 514 N.Y.S.2d 107; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562, 427 N.Y......
-
Republick Nat'l Bank of NY v. Zito
...of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., supra; Rentz v Modell, 262 A.D.2d 545; Raia Indus. v Young, 124 A.D.2d 722). It is also well settled that in moving for summary judgment in an action to foreclose a mortgage, a plaintiff establishes its cas......
-
Special Cases
...in their favor. Winegard v. New York University Medical Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851, 487 N.Y.S.2d 31 (1985); Raia Industries Inc v. Young, 124 A.D.2d 722, 508 N.Y.S.2d 229 (2nd Dep’t. 1986). In rendering a decision, the Court must draw all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorab......