La Raia v. La Raia
| Decision Date | 29 May 1952 |
| Citation | 106 N.E.2d 537,329 Mass. 92 |
| Parties | LA RAIA v. LA RAIA. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
C. Sheldon Williams, Quincy, for libellant.
Before QUA, C. J., and LUMMUS, RONAN and SPALDING, JJ.
This is a libel for divorce in a Probate Court on the ground of cruel and abusive treatment. At the hearing on May 17, 1951, the libellant introduced evidence which the judge finds was sufficient to support a decree nisi. The libellee came into court at a continued hearing on May 24, 1951, and expressed a desire to contest the libel. On August 15, 1951, the libellee was permitted to file a late answer. On October 10, 1951, the libellant moved for the entry of a decree nisi for divorce, which the judge denied. On October 17, 1951, the libellant appealed.
The granting of a divorce is not discretionary. The judge has no right to postpone decision indefinitely, but must grant the divorce if the libellant makes out a case entitling him to it. Waterhouse v. Waterhouse, 225 Mass. 228, 114 N.E. 283; Reddington v. Reddington, 317 Mass. 760, 764, 59 N.E.2d 775, 15 A.L.R. 1448. See also Mooney v. Mooney, 317 Mass. 433, 58 N.E.2d 748. But in the instant case all that the judge did was to grant a further hearing to the libellee. That was within his power. Malcolm v. Malcolm, 257 Mass. 225, 153 N.E. 461; Lye v. Lye, 322 Mass. 155, 76 N.E.2d 180. The power to reconsider a case resides in a court until final judgment or decree. Peterson v. Honson, 306 Mass. 597, 601-602, 29 N.E.2d 140, 132 A.L.R. 1. In this case no decree was ever entered, granting or denying a divorce. An appeal from a decree of a Probate Court is analogous to an appeal in equity. G.L.(Ter.Ed.) c. 215, § 9, as it appears after St.1945, c. 469, § 1, and St.1947, c. 360. No appeal except one from a final decree can come presently to this court. Lynde v. Vose, 326 Mass. 621, 622, 96 N.E.2d 172; Slater v. Munroe, 313 Mass. 538, 540, 48 N.E.2d 149; Clark v. Clark, 325 Mass. 760, 96 N.E.2d 849.
Appeal dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fiorentino v. Probate Court
...words, and the granting of a divorce is not discretionary. Brown v. Brown, 323 Mass. 332, 334, 81 N.E.2d 820 (1948). La Raia v. La Raia, 329 Mass. 92, 105 N.E.2d 537 (1952). Even if the present substantive grounds are regarded as strictly limited, they can and do experience change. 3 Many S......
-
Borman v. Borman
...court until a final judgment has been entered. 7 Lynde v. Vose, 326 Mass. 621, 622, 96 N.E.2d 172 (1951). See LaRaia v. LaRaia, 329 Mass. 92, 93, 105 N.E.2d 537 (1952); Vincent v. Plecker, 319 Mass. 560, 564, 67 N.E.2d 145 (1946). See also G.L. c. 215, § 22. Whether either order appealed fr......
-
Olsson v. Waite
...second decree was interlocutory, and no appeal except one from a final decree can come presently to this court. La Raia v. La Raia, 329 Mass. 92, 93, 105 N.E.2d 537 (1952). Slater v. Munroe, 313 Mass. 538, 540, 48 N.E.2d 149 (1943). See Foreign Auto Import, Inc. v. Renault Northeast, Inc., ......
-
Beit v. Probate and Family Court Dept.
...has been entered" in the underlying action. Borman v. Borman, 378 Mass. 775, 779, 393 N.E.2d 847 (1979). See LaRaia v. LaRaia, 329 Mass. 92, 93, 105 N.E.2d 537 (1952); Lynde v. Vose, 326 Mass. 621, 622, 96 N.E.2d 172 (1951); Vincent v. Plecker, 319 Mass. 560, 564, 67 N.E.2d 145 (1946). See ......