Railway Co. v. Pero

Decision Date28 January 1902
Docket Number7,593.
PartiesRAILWAY CO. v. PERO.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Error to circuit court, Lucas county.

Emery D. Potter, George C. Greene, and F. L. Jerome, for plaintiff in error.

Hurd, Brumback & Thatcher and C. A. Thatcher, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.

WILLIAMS, BURKET, and SPEAR, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Kratzer
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 24 Enero 1930
    ...was shown. Readily assenting that Plummer and Coonriver were superior servants of plaintiff (Ohio Gen. Code, § 9016; Railroad v. Pero, 65 Ohio St. 608, 63 N. E. 1132, affirming same case in 22 Ohio Cir. Ct. R. 130, 12 O. C. D. 25), the fact is that neither directed him to go upon the tracks......
  • Gardiner v. Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 28 Enero 1902

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT