Railway Co. v. Henderson
Decision Date | 11 March 1893 |
Citation | 21 S.W. 878,57 Ark. 402 |
Parties | RAILWAY COMPANY v. HENDERSON |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from White Circuit Court, GRANT GREEN, JR. Judge.
Action by Henderson & Jelks against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. The complaint substantially alleged that plaintiffs purchased, at Auvergne, in Jackson county Arkansas, 13 head of Jersey cattle; that their vendor, J. T Henderson, contracted with the Batesville & Brinkley Railway Company to transport the cattle from Auvergne to Searcy in White county, Arkansas; that the latter company furnished a car, which it had obtained from defendant railway company for the purpose of transporting the cattle; that the car so furnished was at the time infected with the germs of Texas or Southern cattle fever; that said infection was produced by the droppings of diseased cattle which had been transported therein, and that defendant had negligently permitted such droppings to remain in the car until it had become infected with the germs of the cattle fever; that, by reason of said infected condition of the car, plaintiffs' cattle became infected with the fever, and in a short time after their arrival at Searcy nine of them took sick and died.
The answer admitted
J. T Henderson, the vendor of the cattle, testified:
David Brennan, a witness, was present when the cattle were loaded upon the car at Auvergne on the Batesville & Brinkley Railroad. J. T. Henderson, the shipper, B. B. Phillips, Boyd Drennan and himself were present and assisted witness in loading the cattle. They were loaded about 3:30 on the afternoon of July 17th. The agent of the Batesville & Brinkley Railroad was present. The loading was superintended by himself and J. T. Henderson, the shipper. Witness took care of the cattle all the way while on the train. Witness had a pass over the road, and it was his name signed and endorsed on the live stock contract in evidence. The cattle were seventeen hours on the cars, coming from Auvergne to Searcy. Witness examined the car before it was loaded at Auvergne and it had been occupied by cattle. It had been loaded with wood and stoves prior to loading the cattle, but apparently had been quite recently occupied by cattle. Witness made a personal effort to clean out the car before loading the stock. It looked like it had been recently loaded with wood and stoves, and sometime prior to this with cattle, and it looked like it had been used in the transportation of coal, wood or stoves within the last six months prior to its being loaded at Auvergne. Defendant knew that the State of Texas was infected with Texas or Southern cattle fever. He did not know of any well established line running north or south of Little Rock that would contain all the territory infected with the disease. He did not know whether Arkansas or any part of it was within the infected district. He knew that in Jackson county, all during the summer 1889, there had been Texas fever at Newport."
Dr. J. M. Jelks, one of the plaintiffs, testified that their cattle reached Searcy on July 17th, 1889, and were delivered to them by the Searcy & West Point Railroad. They were unloaded, driven through Searcy and about half-mile on the west side of town, and there put in a 40-acre field. This field had been open for a long time, and all of the cattle in the neighborhood had been in the habit of grazing on the field, and, just before the Jersey cattle arrived, witness fenced up the field and placed their cattle in it. About two weeks after this stock arrived, they commenced getting sick. A cow took sick first, and died in two or three days afterwards. Nearly all of the balance of the cattle took sick and nine of them died after three or four days' sickness. The bull was not put with other cattle in the pasture. He was kept in a stall in the livery stable just across the street from the court house, was watered and fed in the stable. He was only out once or twice and then in a small lot of perhaps an acre where Mr. Rogers kept his family cow. The bull died with the same disease the others died with. The heifer which was sent to the college ran in the pasture with the other cattle, but she did not die. Witness had heard of no other cattle dying about Searcy at that time.
J. T. Flynn, superintendent of the Batesville & Brinkley Railway Company, testified, with reference to the car in which the cattle were transported, as follows: The following question was then asked him, over defendant's objection: Q. "In order to have gotten this car for the purpose of shipping J. T. Henderson's cattle, what information would you have to give in order to get the car you wanted?" The answer was permitted to be given over objection: A. "In making requisition for cars, we had to give our connecting carrier information for the purpose we had to use the car, and for what point it was destined."
J. R Hubbard testified (Counsel for defendant stated that subpoenas had been issued to Woodruff, Jackson and Pulaski counties for J. W. Clayton, and that a special agent had been employed hunting for him for sometime, but that it had been impossible to find his whereabouts.) The following question was then asked witness: To this question plaintiffs objected as incompetent and immaterial. The objection was sustained, and defendant excepted. The defendant then offered in evidence the record kept at Diaz by the defendant railroad company in June and July, 1889, which showed the Missouri Pacific car No. 6335 arrived at Diaz on June 27th, loaded with coal, consigned to W. T. Kelly, division superintendent; that it remained at Diaz loaded with coal on June 28th, 29th and 30th, July 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Steffen v. S.W. Bell Tel. Co.
...820; Ridenour v. Wilcox Rives Co., 164 Mo. App. 576, 147 S.W. 852; Shirley v. So. Ry. Co., 198 Ala. 102, 73 So. 430; Railway Co. v. Henderson, 57 Ark. 402, 21 S.W. 878; Sill v. Reese, 47 Cal. 294; Butler v. Estrella Raisin Vineyard Co., 124 Cal. 239, 56 Pac. 1040; Chafee & Co. v. United Sta......
-
State v. Budge
...this court unless there has been a clear abuse of judicial discretion. Vaughan v. State, 58 Ark. 353, 371, 24 S. W. 885. Railway v. Henderson, 57 Ark. 402, 21 S. W. 878; Wilson v. State, 175 Ind. 458, 466, 93 N. E. 609; People v. Bruno, 220 N. T. 702, 115 N. E. 1004; State v. Emory, 116 Kan......
-
Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Shipley, 74--115
... ... Little Rock & Ft. Smith Railway Co. v. Barker, 39 Ark. 491; Fernwood Mining Co. v. Pluna, 136 Ark. 107, 205 S.W. 822. The judge's determination of the necessity for his being ... den., 292 U.S. 649, 545 S.Ct. 857, 78 L.Ed. 1499; Biddle v. Jacobs, 116 Ark. 82, 172 S.W. 258; St. Louis, I.M. & S. Railway Co. v. Henderson, 57 Ark. 402, 21 S.W. 878. See A.M.I. Civil, 2d Ed., 202 ... In arriving at his conclusion, the chancellor necessarily had to ... ...
- Taylor v. McClintock