Railway Co. v. Ullom
| Decision Date | 23 April 1901 |
| Docket Number | 7,149. |
| Parties | RAILWAY CO. v. ULLOM. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Error to circuit court, Morrow county.
Cummings & McBride, Olds & Olds, and J. T. Dye, for plaintiff in error.
Mitchell & Brice and J. W. Barry, for defendant in error.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Miresso v. State
...N.E.2d 34; Cleveland, C.C. & St. L.R. Co. v. Ullom (1898), 20 Ohio Cir.Cr.R. 512, 11 Ohio C.D. 321, aff'd without op. Railway Co. v. Ullom, 64 Ohio St. 582, 61 N.E. 1148; B. H. Palmer & Son v. Cowie (1905), 7 Ohio Cir.Ct.R. N.S. 46, 27 Ohio Cir.Ct.R. 617; State v. Cottrell (1896), 19 R.I. 7......
-
Roberto, In re
... ... (2d) 311, Sec. 296. See also, Hurd and Long, Ohio Trial Evidence, page 252, Sec. 13.2, the case of Cleveland C., C., etc. R. Co. v. Ullom, 20 Ohio Cir. Ct. R. 512, 11 Ohio Cir.Dec. Dec. 321 (affirmed without opinion 64 Ohio St. 582, 61 N.E. 1148.) Dr. Roberto cannot testify as to ... ...
- Reigel v. Coons