Rainey v. Smizer
Decision Date | 31 March 1859 |
Citation | 28 Mo. 310 |
Parties | RAINEY, Appellant, v. SMIZER & GRIMM, Respondents. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. In a suit to recover damages for the breach of a written contract entered into with two persons, both must join as parties plaintiff. The fifth section of the second article of the practice act is inapplicable to such a case. (R. C. 1855, p. 1218.)
Appeal from St. Louis Law Commissioner's Court.
George Smizer entered into a contract with James C. Rainey and Jacob Grimm, of which the following are the substantial provisions:
The present suit is brought by Rainey alone to recover the sum of one hundred and five dollars, alleged to be due the plaintiff under the contract, and the further sum of forty-five dollars, alleged to be one-half the value of the work done under the contract. Grimm was made a defendant for the reason, as stated in the petition, that he had refused to become a party plaintiff and had confederated with plaintiff to hinder and delay plaintiff from recovering his demand.
The court instructed the jury that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.
C. C. Simmons, for appellant.
C. G. Mauro and Gardner, for respondents.
If it is conceded that by the contract between the parties Smizer was bound to pay the plaintiff, immediately upon the commencement of the work, the sum of one hundred and five dollars, the amount due the plaintiff for services performed in building the mill under a contract with Probeck, yet that sum constituted but a part of the consideration of the contract. The refusal of Smizer to comply with his contract with ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Elmer v. Hughes
...cannot maintain an action thereon without the concurrence of the other, citing in its opinion: Clark v. Cable, 21 Mo. 223; Raney v. Smizer, 28 Mo. 310; Henry v. Mt. Pleasant Twp. of Bates County, 70 500; Slaughter v. Davenport, 151 Mo. 26; Peters v. McDonough, 327 Mo. 487. (a) And it pointe......
-
Andrus v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Association
......All parties in interest must be. joined in one suit. Voss v. Life Ins. Co., supra; Parsons on. Contracts (7 Ed.), 17; Ramey v. Smizer, 28 Mo. 310;. Thieman v. Goodnight, 17 Mo.App. 435. (d) The. personal representatives of Mrs. Hatfield were necessary. parties to this suit. ......
-
Harwood v. Toms
...70 Mo. 500; 1 Parsons on Contracts [6 Ed.], side paging 21 to 26; Clark v. Cable, 21 Mo. 223; Ryan v. Riddle, 78 Mo. 521; Rainey v. Smizer, 28 Mo. 310; v. Carey, 60 Mo. 224; Bishop on Contracts, sec. 875, and cases there cited. (2) Either one of the three joint obligees, Frederick, House, o......
-
Laumeier v. Sammelmann
...... obligees, and no assessment of damages can be had on the. motion of less than the whole number of obligees. Rainey. v. Smiser, 28 Mo. 310; Dewey v. Casey, 60 Mo. 224; Henry v. Mt. Pleasant Township, 70 Mo. 500;. Ryan v. Riddle, 78 Mo. 521; Ohnsorg v. Turner, ......