Ralda-Sanden v. Sanden, Docket No. 1–12–1117.

CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois
Writing for the CourtJustice SIMON specially concurred
Citation2013 IL App (1st) 121117,371 Ill.Dec. 215,989 N.E.2d 1143
Docket NumberDocket No. 1–12–1117.
Decision Date30 April 2013
PartiesCollett RALDA–SANDEN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Robert SANDEN, Defendant–Appellee.

2013 IL App (1st) 121117
989 N.E.2d 1143
371 Ill.Dec.
215

Collett RALDA–SANDEN, Plaintiff–Appellant,
v.
Robert SANDEN, Defendant–Appellee.

Docket No. 1–12–1117.

Appellate Court of Illinois,
First District, Second Division.

April 30, 2013.


[989 N.E.2d 1144]


Lisa Madigan, Attorney General (Michael A. Scodro, Solicitor General, and Diane M. Potts, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), and Legal Assistance Foundation (Jennifer Payne and Miriam Hallbauer, of counsel), both of Chicago, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.


OPINION

Presiding Justice HARRIS delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion.

[371 Ill.Dec. 216]¶ 1 Plaintiff, Collett Ralda–Sanden (hereinafter is referred to as Collett), appeals the order of the circuit court dismissing her complaint to establish paternity against defendant, Robert Sanden (hereinafter is referred to as Robert), pursuant to section 2–619 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2–619 (West 2010)). On appeal, Collett contends (1) the statute of limitations period contained in section 8(a)(1) of the Illinois Parentage Act of 1984 (Parentage Act) (750 ILCS 45/8(a)(1) (West 2010)), should be equitably tolled where she had no knowledge of a cause of action prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations period, and where Robert fraudulently concealed the cause of action by intimidating Collett's mother; (2) Robert should be estopped from asserting the statute of limitations defense where his wrongful conduct precluded Collett from discovering his identity in a timely manner; and (3) refusal to toll the statute of limitations here would violate Collett's equal protection rights by depriving her of a reasonable opportunity to make her paternity claim. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2 JURISDICTION

¶ 3 The trial court granted Robert's section 2–619 motion to dismiss on March 14, 2012. Collett filed this notice of appeal on April 12, 2012. Accordingly, this court has jurisdiction pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rules 301 and 303 governing appeals from final judgments entered below. [371 Ill.Dec. 217]

[989 N.E.2d 1145]

Ill. S.Ct. R. 301 (eff. Feb. 1, 1994); R. 303 (eff. May 30, 2008).

¶ 4 BACKGROUND

¶ 5 On October 19, 2011, Collett filed her verified complaint to establish paternity pursuant to section 7(a) of the Parentage Act (750 ILCS 45/7(a) (West 2010)). In her complaint, Collett alleged that she was born in Chicago, Illinois, to Ana Ralda (hereinafter referred to as Ana or mother) on October 24, 1989. She had never met her biological father and whenever she inquired about him, Ana always told her that her father had died in a car accident. In her uncontradicted affidavit, Collett stated that she had arguments with her mother about the identity of her father because Ana refused to talk about him. When she was a teenager, Collett applied for a state identification card (ID). She obtained her birth certificate in order to get the ID and she noticed the certificate listed her last name as “Ralda–Sanden” Until then, Collett had not known her father's last name.

¶ 6 After learning of her father's name, Collett periodically looked on the computer for information about her father but she did not find anything because “there are a lot of Robert's on the internet,” and her mother continued to tell her that her father was long dead from a car accident. In July, 2011, Collett and Ana had a “bad argument” about her father and Ana then first told the truth to Collett. She told Collett that her father repeatedly raped Ana and that she ran away. Ana called the police but she dropped criminal charges against him. She also told Collett for the first time that her father “was probably still alive” and she gave his middle initial and birth date. She told Collett that he used to live in Evanston, Illinois. Based on that previously secreted information, Collett's Internet searches brought positive results. She discovered Robert was alive and living in Florida. Within three months she filed her paternity complaint.

¶ 7 In her uncontradicted affidavit, Ana stated that she is Collett's mother. She worked for Robert and his wife from 1988 to April of 1989 as a live-in nanny for their two-year-old daughter. Ana stated that about four months into her employment, Robert came into her bedroom one night while his wife was out of town, put a gun to her mouth and raped her. At the time, Ana was 4 feet 11 inches tall and weighed 95 pounds. Over the next six to seven months, Robert forced himself on Ana “about 30 times.”

¶ 8 Ana began to feel sick in March of 1989. Robert took her to a clinic and they discovered that Ana was pregnant. Ana stated that she was a virgin when Robert raped her and she had not had sexual relations with anyone else at that time. Robert demanded that Ana terminate the pregnancy and became violent when she refused. When Robert attempted to rape Ana in April 1989, she ran away to a store where a clerk who spoke Spanish called police for her. Ana was taken to Evanston hospital and the police arrested Robert. The State's Attorney's office brought criminal charges against him and Ana left to live with a friend.

¶ 9 After his release from jail, Robert found Ana and threatened to kill her and her family in Guatemala. He forced Ana into his car and drove her to his attorney's office where he told her to sign some papers in which she recanted her statements concerning Robert's sexual assault against her. Ana was so intimidated by and fearful of Robert that she dropped the criminal charges against him.

[989 N.E.2d 1146]

[371 Ill.Dec. 218]¶ 10 In August of 1989, Robert called Ana and asked if she had seen a doctor. He made an appointment for her and drove her to the appointment. Ana gave birth to Collett on October 24, 1989. When she received the medical bill, Ana told the hospital to send it to Robert at his Evanston address. Robert called Ana in November 1989 and asked about her and the baby. Ana stated that this communication was the last she had with Robert. Robert never paid any support for Collett. In January of 1990, Ana applied for financial assistance and she gave the caseworker Robert's name and address.

¶ 11 Ana stated that she never told Collett the truth about Robert because she was afraid of what he would do if Collett tried to find him. She also did not want Collett to know that she was the product of a rape. Whenever Collett asked about her father, Ana told her only that his name was Robert and that he was dead. When Collett was a teenager, she saw her birth certificate and discovered that her father's name was “Robert.” Collett would search the name on the computer, but she continued to believe that Robert was dead. Collett never found any information about her father on the computer.

¶ 12 In July of 2011, Ana finally told Collett the truth about her father. With the information, Collett discovered Robert alive and living in Florida. Ana stated that prior to that day, Collett did not know Robert was alive.

¶ 13 On October 19, 2011, Collett filed her petition to establish paternity. Robert filed a section 2–619(a)(5) motion to dismiss the petition, alleging that it was not filed within the time period specified in section 8(a)(1) of the Parentage Act. Collett responded that the two-year statute of limitations period in section 8(a)(1) should be equitably tolled until the time she discovered her father was actually alive. She further argued that Robert should be equitably estopped from asserting the statute of limitations defense due to his misconduct against Ana.

¶ 14 Although the trial court found the facts of the case, taken as true, were “reprehensible,” it granted the motion to dismiss on March 14, 2012. It reasoned that the limitations period was sufficiently lengthy for a child to discover his or her parentage, and that “[t]o add an equitable tolling doctrine would open the floodgates to almost every claim of parentage made after a child reaches the age of 18.” The trial court also declined to apply the equitable estoppel doctrine “when there is no appellate or other cited authority in this or any other jurisdiction supporting that extension.” Collett filed this timely appeal.

¶ 15 We note that Robert did not file an appellee brief. However, this court may decide issues on appeal without the appellee brief and we choose to do so in this case. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp., 63 Ill.2d 128, 133, 345 N.E.2d 493 (1976).

¶ 16 ANALYSIS

¶ 17 Collett argues that the trial court erred in granting Robert's motion to dismiss because the statute of limitations period in section 8(a)(1) should have been equitably tolled given her situation. A section 2–619 motion to dismiss admits the sufficiency of the claim but asserts affirmative matter that defeats the claim. Patrick Engineering, Inc. v. City of Naperville, 2012 IL 113148, ¶ 31, 364 Ill.Dec. 40, 976 N.E.2d 318. Robert's assertion that Collett's petition is barred by the statute of limitations is a matter properly raised by a section 2–619 motion to dismiss. [371 Ill.Dec. 219]

[989 N.E.2d 1147]

735 ILCS 5/2–619(a)(5) (West 2010). The motion takes as true all well-pleaded facts and all reasonable inferences taken from those facts. Calloway v. Kinkelaar, 168 Ill.2d 312, 325, 213 Ill.Dec. 675, 659 N.E.2d 1322 (1995). Furthermore, the court views all pleadings and supporting documents in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. DeSmet v. County of Rock Island, 219 Ill.2d 497, 504, 302 Ill.Dec. 466, 848 N.E.2d 1030 (2006). We review the trial court's grant of a section 2–619 motion to dismiss de novo. DeLuna v. Burciaga, 223 Ill.2d 49, 59, 306 Ill.Dec. 136, 857 N.E.2d 229 (2006).

¶ 18 Section 8(a)(1) of the Parentage Act requires that a parentage action brought by or on behalf of a child “shall be barred if brought later than 2 years after the child reaches the age of majority.” 750 ILCS 45/8(a)(1) (West 2010). Collett was born on October...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 practice notes
  • Doe v. Hastert, Docket No. 2-18-0250
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 21, 2019
    ...of extraordinary situation in which equitable tolling applies.¶ 50 Plaintiff cites Ralda-Sanden v. Sanden , 2013 IL App (1st) 121117, 371 Ill.Dec. 215, 989 N.E.2d 1143, to support his argument that equitable tolling applies here. In Ralda-Sanden , the plaintiff filed a complaint under the I......
  • Ritchie Capital Mgmt., L. L.C. v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 18-1130
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • June 3, 2020
    ...the doctrine. See Williams v. Bd. of Review , 241 Ill.2d 352, 350 Ill.Dec. 281, 948 N.E.2d 561, 567–72 (2011) ; Ralda-Sanden v. Sanden , 371 Ill.Dec. 215, 989 N.E.2d 1143, 1148–49 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). Williams is not helpful to the Ritchie entities’ argument because the Illinois Supreme Co......
  • Ibanez-Vazquez v. Dart, Case No. 19 C 5269
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Northern District of Illinois)
    • February 18, 2021
    ...It exists only "where a plaintiff was prevented from asserting his or her rights in some extraordinary way." Ralda-Sanden v. Sanden, 989 N.E.2d 1143, 1149 (Ill. App. 1st Dist. 2013). "Extraordinary barriers include legal disability, an irredeemable lack of information, or situations where t......
  • Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Plunkett, No. 1–13–1631.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 27, 2014
    ...while neither party cites it, this court found the doctrine applicable in Ralda–Sanden v. Sanden, 2013 IL App (1st) 121117, ¶ 26, 371 Ill.Dec. 215, 989 N.E.2d 1143, a case in which the plaintiff sought to file suit under the Illinois Parentage Act of 1984 (750 ILCS 45/1 et seq. (West 2010))......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • Doe v. Hastert, Docket No. 2-18-0250
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 21, 2019
    ...of extraordinary situation in which equitable tolling applies.¶ 50 Plaintiff cites Ralda-Sanden v. Sanden , 2013 IL App (1st) 121117, 371 Ill.Dec. 215, 989 N.E.2d 1143, to support his argument that equitable tolling applies here. In Ralda-Sanden , the plaintiff filed a complaint under the I......
  • Ritchie Capital Mgmt., L. L.C. v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 18-1130
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • June 3, 2020
    ...the doctrine. See Williams v. Bd. of Review , 241 Ill.2d 352, 350 Ill.Dec. 281, 948 N.E.2d 561, 567–72 (2011) ; Ralda-Sanden v. Sanden , 371 Ill.Dec. 215, 989 N.E.2d 1143, 1148–49 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). Williams is not helpful to the Ritchie entities’ argument because the Illinois Supreme Co......
  • Ibanez-Vazquez v. Dart, Case No. 19 C 5269
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Northern District of Illinois)
    • February 18, 2021
    ...It exists only "where a plaintiff was prevented from asserting his or her rights in some extraordinary way." Ralda-Sanden v. Sanden, 989 N.E.2d 1143, 1149 (Ill. App. 1st Dist. 2013). "Extraordinary barriers include legal disability, an irredeemable lack of information, or situations where t......
  • Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Plunkett, No. 1–13–1631.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 27, 2014
    ...while neither party cites it, this court found the doctrine applicable in Ralda–Sanden v. Sanden, 2013 IL App (1st) 121117, ¶ 26, 371 Ill.Dec. 215, 989 N.E.2d 1143, a case in which the plaintiff sought to file suit under the Illinois Parentage Act of 1984 (750 ILCS 45/1 et seq. (West 2010))......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT