Randall v. United States

Citation148 F.2d 234
Decision Date18 June 1945
Docket NumberNo. 11152.,11152.
PartiesRANDALL v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

G. Ernest Jones and Roderick Beddow, both of Birmingham, Ala., and Joseph S. Ray, of Columbus, Ga., for appellant.

John P. Cowart, U. S. Atty., and Chas. W. Walker, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Macon, Ga., and Ralph R. Qullian, Dist. Enforcement Atty., Office of Price Administration, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

Writ of Certiorari Denied June 18, 1945. See 65 S.Ct. 1579.

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

Joel O. Randall was tried to a jury and convicted on charges preferred on information filed by the United States District Attorney. The three counts of the information were alike except in the description of the gasoline coupons alleged to have been unlawfully possessed. Each count charged that the defendant did willfully and unlawfully have in his possession gasoline ration coupons not acquired in accordance with the provisions of Ration Order 5C, or any prior gasoline ration orders issued and effective pursuant to law. Title III, Section 301 of the Second War Powers Act, amending Pub. Law 671, 76th Congress, § 2(a), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 633, and Section 1394.8177(c) of Ration Order No. 5C.

The defendant was sentenced to serve one year imprisonment and to pay a fine of $5,000.

The important evidence shows that while officers were on a highway near Columbus, Georgia seeking to locate and apprehend Barney Berry, an escaped convict, two cars passed them on the road; the officers followed the cars and after they had turned into a private driveway they found that Joel O. Randall and Barney Berry were the occupants of one of the cars. Under the front seat of this car was found approximately 200,000 gallons worth of gasoline ration coupons secreted in paper bags. These bags were pushed under the front seat between the driver of the car and the other passenger. Randall was arrested while he was still in the automobile and the tickets were removed from the car. After the arrest of Randall and his companion, the automobile from which the coupons were taken was brought to police headquarters and was later released on Randall's request and on written order of his attorney. The arrest of Randall and Barney Berry was made immediately after the car stopped in the driveway.

The gasoline coupon tickets in question had been stolen from the Hillsboro County War Price and Ration Board at Tampa, Florida. It was shown that the chief clerk of the Ration Board had received the coupons, and on Saturday, May 20, 1944, had placed them in a vault; on the following Monday it was discovered that the vault had been broken open and the coupons taken. The chief clerk testified that he had examined the records of the board and found that the coupons had not been issued to any person. He further testified after an examination of the coupons taken from the Randall car that they were the same coupons as the ones taken from the vault of the Tampa Ration Board.

The Congress acted within constitutional bounds when it delegated the power to fix and define crimes and penalties for crimes, as provided in the Act here under consideration. Such legislation was not an unauthorized delegation of legislative power. Shreveport Engraving Co. v. United States, 5 Cir., 143 F.2d 222, certiorari denied 65 S.Ct. 82; United States v. Randall, 2 Cir., 140 F.2d 70; O'Neal v. United States, 6 Cir., 140 F.2d 908, 151 A.L.R. 1474; Gallagher's Steak House v. Bowles, 2 Cir., 142 F.2d 530; Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81, 63 S.Ct. 1375, 88 L.Ed. 1774; ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Fredrick v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • October 13, 1947
    ...as to it is not responsive to the charge in any other count." See also Thomas v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 127 F.2d 976, 978; Randall v. United States, 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 234, 235, certiorari denied, 325 U.S. 885, 65 S.Ct. 1579, 89 L.Ed. Before leaving the subject of the sufficiency of the informati......
  • United States v. Weinberg
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • June 29, 1972
    ...the entire mass of documents for perusal in the court-room." 4 Wigmore on Evidence, § 1231, p. 441 (3rd Ed. 1940). Randall v. United States, 148 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1945); See Yoffe v. United States, 153 F.2d 570, 575 (1st Cir. 1946); Bowen v. United States, 153 F.2d 747, 750 (8th Cir. 1946)......
  • Christoffel v. United States, 10568.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • September 18, 1952
    ...Stearn v. United States, 4 Cir., 1927, 18 F.2d 465, 467, certiorari denied, 275 U.S. 539, 48 S. Ct. 36, 72 L.Ed. 414; Randall v. United States, 5 Cir., 1945, 148 F.2d 234, certiorari denied, 325 U.S. 885, 65 S.Ct. 1579, 89 L.Ed. 2000; Gurinsky v. United States, 5 Cir., 1919, 259 F. 378, 380......
  • Lotto v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • December 4, 1946
    ...program by promulgating the rules and regulations involved herein, Congress acted within its constitutional authority. Randall v. United States, 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 234, certiorari denied 325 U.S. 885, 65 S.Ct. 1579, 89 L.Ed. 2000. See also Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81, 63 S.Ct. 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT