Rannells v. Flynn
| Decision Date | 31 October 1869 |
| Citation | 44 Mo. 604 |
| Parties | CHARLES A. RANNELLS, Respondent, v. JAMES FLYNN and THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Appellants. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court
Glover & Shepley, for respondent.
R. M. Field, for appellants.
The appellants have failed to assign errors in this court, and the respondent now moves the court to affirm the judgment.
The motion will be sustained and the judgment affirmed.
The other judges concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Carney v. Carney
...Mo. 94; Rogers v. Rogers, 87 Mo. 257. O. D. Jones for respondents. (1) There is no assignment of errors. Nothing here to review. Rannels v. Flynn, 44 Mo. 604; Miller Folinsbee, 59 Mo. 183; R. S., sec. 3764. And respondents now ask the court to affirm the judgment. (2) The filing of reply an......
-
State v. Clawson
... ... appellant's brief--no error in which to join. Rule 18, ... this court; Rev. Stat., sec. 3764; Rannells v ... Flynn, 44 Mo. 604; Miller v. Folinsbee, 59 Mo ... 183. The indictment is sufficient--more than is necessary, ... but the material ... ...
-
Koontz v. Kaufman
...secs. 3764, 3765. Where no such assignment of errors is made, the court will dismiss the writ, etc. 57 Mo. 602; 51 Mo. 412; 59 Mo. 143; 44 Mo. 604; Mo. 230. This is to make an issue in this court. The statute directs us to examine the record, as presented here, on the assignments, and to af......
- Nelson v. Brodhack