Ransom v. Rutherford County
Decision Date | 02 April 1910 |
Parties | RANSOM et al. v. RUTHERFORD COUNTY et al. |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Appeal from Chancery Court, Rutherford County; Walter S. Bearden Chancellor.
Bill by James A. Ransom and others against Rutherford County and another. From a decree for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
Thos B. Lytle, E. D. Hancock, and J. T. Jetton, for appellants.
Ridley & Richardson, Jesse W. Sparks, and A. L. Todd, for appellees.
The bill was preferred by certain citizens and taxpayers of Rutherford county and the city of Murfreesboro against said city and county to impeach the validity of two acts, passed by the General Assembly of 1909, providing for the establishment of normal schools and the issuance of bonds by said city and county for the purchase of sites and the erection of buildings for said schools.
The first act assailed is chapter 264, Acts of 1909, approved April 27, 1909, and entitled:
"An act to provide for the improvement of the system of public education of the state of Tennessee--that is to say, to establish a general education fund by appropriating thereto annually twenty-five per cent. of the gross revenue of the state; to provide for the apportionment of this fund and specifying what part shall be apportioned to the several counties of the state on the basis of scholastic population; what part shall be used to equalize more nearly the school facilities of the several counties, and the conditions on which this part shall be apportioned; what sum shall be used to assist in paying salaries of county superintendents, and on what conditions; what part shall be used to encourage and assist in the establishment and maintenance of public county high schools, and on what conditions; and providing for the grading and inspecting of high schools; what part shall be used for the establishment and maintenance of school libraries and on what conditions; what part shall be used for the establishment and maintenance of three normal schools for white teachers, one in each grand division of the state, and one agricultural and industrial normal school for negroes, and providing for the location, establishment, and control of said schools; and what part shall be apportioned to the University of Tennessee and its various stations; and to repeal chapter 537 of the Acts of 1907."
Section 1 provides:
"That for the purpose of improving, unifying and extending the system of public education of the state of Tennessee, for the purpose of giving more adequate support to public schools of all grades, and for the purpose of extending the benefits of the school system more equally to all the sections, counties, and districts of the state, a general education fund shall be, and the same is hereby created, and for the year one thousand nine hundred and nine and annually thereafter twenty-five per cent. of the gross revenue of the state shall be paid into this general education fund, to be apportioned as hereinafter provided; and the Comptroller of the Treasury shall pass, and he is hereby directed to pass, on the first day of January and the first day of July of each and every year, to the credit of said general education fund, the amount due thereto according to the provisions of this act, and to distribute the same as hereinafter provided."
Section 2 provides:
"That sixty-one per cent. of the general education fund provided by this act shall be apportioned to the several counties of the state according to scholastic population, as the interest on the permanent school fund is apportioned and for the same purposes."
Section 3 provides:
"That ten per cent. of the general education fund provided by this act shall be, and the same is hereby, set aside as a special fund to be used and expended for the purpose of more nearly equalizing the common schools in the several counties of the state, the same to be apportioned among the several counties of the state by the State Board of Education in accordance with the provisions hereinafter set forth."
Section 7 of said act provides:
Section 9 provides:
"That all schools receiving assistance under the provisions of this act shall be recognized as essential parts of the system of public education of the state of Tennessee, and annually, on or before the first day of August, the proper authorities of each shall submit to the State Superintendent of Public Instruction a report in regard to the work, development, and progress of the school during the year ending with the thirtieth day of June next preceding, and a clear and itemized statement of all receipts and expenditures for the same period."
The other act assailed is chapter 580, Acts of 1909, approved May 1, 1909, and may be termed an enabling act to carry out the provisions of chapter 264, providing for the establishment of state normal schools.
Chapter 580 of 1909 is entitled:
"A bill allowing municipalities or counties to issue and sell bonds for the purpose of purchasing sites and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gates v. Long
... ... February 12, 1938 ... Appeal ... from Chancery Court, Davidson County; R. B. C. Howell, Sr., ... Chancellor ... Suit by ... Charles A. Gates, ... 546, 266 ... S.W. 107; Hill v. Roberts, 142 Tenn. 215, 217 S.W ... 826; Ransom v. Rutherford County, 123 Tenn. 1, 130 ... S.W. 1057, Ann.Cas.1912B, 1356 ... ...
-
Palmer v. Southern Exp. Co.
...43, 126 S.W. 730, 135 Am. St. Rep. 851; Ledgerwood v. Pitts, 122 Tenn. 570, 125 S.W. 1036; [165 S.W. 246] Ransom v. Rutherford County, 123 Tenn. 1, 130 S.W. 1057, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 1356; Coke & Coal Co. v. Steel Co., 123 Tenn. 428, 131 S.W. 988, 31 L. R. A. (N. S.) 278; Kelly v. State, 123 T......
-
State v. Cumberland Club
... ... Appeal ... from Criminal Court, Hamilton County; S.D. McReynolds, Judge ... Appeal ... from Criminal Court, Knox County; T. A ... 609; Rhinehart v. State, ... 121 Tenn. 420, 117 S.W. 508, 17 Ann. Cas. 254; Ransom v ... Rutherford County, 123 Tenn. 1, 21, 130 S.W. 1057, Ann ... Cas. 1912B, 1356; Todtenhausen ... ...
-
City of Knoxville v. Gervin
... ... Appeal ... from Chancery Court, Knox County; A. E. Mitchell, Chancellor ... Suit by ... the City of Knoxville against W ... necessary to carry out the legislative intent. Ransom v ... Rutherford County, 123 Tenn. 1, 23, 130 S.W. 1057, ... Ann.Cas. 1912B, 1356; Bird v ... ...