Raskin v. State

• Decision Date: 06 February 1992
• Docket Number: No. S91A1624,S91A1624
• Citation: 412 S.E.2d 832,261 Ga. 848
• Parties: RASKIN v. STATE.
• Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Page 832

412 S.E.2d 832

261 Ga. 848

RASKIN v. STATE.

No. S91A1624.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Feb. 6, 1992.

William R. McCracken, Augusta, for Raskin.

Michael C. Eubanks, Dist. Atty., Augusta, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., C.A. Benjamin Woolf, Atty., State Law Dept., Atlanta, for State.

HUNT, Justice.

Defendant Fred Raskin appeals his convictions for murder, false imprisonment, and possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony, for which he received sentences of life, 10 years and 5 years, respectively. ¹ On March 29, 1988, the defendant, an attorney from Louisville, Georgia, kidnapped and shot his estranged wife, stuffed her body in the 55-gallon drum he had purchased at a hardware store the day before, left the barrel in a rented storage warehouse, and fled. He was arrested nearly a year later in Florida. After he was returned to Augusta, the defendant made an incriminating statement to investigators. Two weeks later, he was hospitalized for several months because of mental illness. At trial, he relied on his history of mental illness to support his plea of insanity, but the jury nevertheless found him guilty of murder. He challenges the admissibility of his custodial statement and the failure to charge on voluntary manslaughter. We affirm.

1. Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury's determination, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of murder, false imprisonment, and possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony, beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89, 90, 263 S.E.2d 131 (1980).

2. We have carefully reviewed the testimony presented at the Jackson- Denno hearing and hold the trial court's decision to admit the defendant's statement into evidence was not clearly erroneous. Peebles v. State, 260 Ga. 165, 166, 391 S.E.2d 639 (1990); Maggard v. State, 259 Ga. 291, 292, 380 S.E.2d 259 (1989).

3. The defendant did not testify. All evidence related to the shooting, including his in-custody statement and statements made to other witnesses, demonstrated a deliberate, premeditated killing and did not authorize a charge on voluntary manslaughter. Under these circumstances, there was no error in refusing such a charge. Hatchett v. State, 259 Ga. 857, 858, 388 S.E.2d 694 (1990).

Judgment affirmed.

CLARKE, C.J., WELTNER, P.J., and BELL, BENHAM and FLETCHER, JJ., concur.

...