Rattner v. Planning Com'n of Village of Pleasantville
| Decision Date | 27 March 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 2,No. 1,1,2 |
| Citation | 554 N.Y.S.2d 831,75 N.Y.2d 897 |
| Parties | , 553 N.E.2d 1341 In the Matter of Marshall RATTNER, et al., Respondents, v. PLANNING COMMISSION OF the VILLAGE OF PLEASANTVILLE, et al., Appellants. (Matter) VILLAGE BOARD of the VILLAGE OF PLEASANTVILLE, et al., Appellants, v. PLANNING COMMISSION of the VILLAGE OF PLEASANTVILLE, Appellant, Marshall Rattner, et al., Respondents; Richard Kersten, et al., Counterclaim Appellants. (Matter) |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Reported below: 156 A.D.2d 521, 548 N.Y.S.2d 943.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine an action or proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution, and it is not a nonfinal order of the type within the meaning of CPLR 5602(a)(2).
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Goodwin v. Pretorius
...( see Matter of Rattner v. Planning Commn. of Vil. of Pleasantville, 156 A.D.2d 521, 526, 548 N.Y.S.2d 943 [1989],lv. dismissed75 N.Y.2d 897, 554 N.Y.S.2d 831, 553 N.E.2d 1341 [1990] )” ( id. at 358, 819 N.Y.S.2d 4). As noted above, the decision in White cited no legal authority for its hol......
- Alvarez v. City of N.Y.
-
Schlau v. City of Buffalo
...order (see Matter of Rattner v. Planning Commn. of Vil. of Pleasantville, 156 A.D.2d 521, 528, 548 N.Y.S.2d 943, appeal dismissed 75 N.Y.2d 897, 554 N.Y.S.2d 831, 553 N.E.2d 1341 ). The court also properly exercised its discretion in awarding costs on the motion to plaintiff (see Greenspan ......
- Chabot v. Cnty. of Rockland
Request a trial to view additional results