Ray v. Brown
| Decision Date | 31 October 1883 |
| Citation | 80 Mo. 230 |
| Parties | RAY v. BROWN et al., Plaintiffs in Error. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Error to Carroll Circuit Court.--HON. E. J. BROADDUS, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Shewalter & Sebree and Mirick for plaintiffs in error.
Hale & Sons for defendant in error.
This is a proceeding in the nature of a bill in equity to foreclose or enforce an equitable mortgage. The defendant Brown filed his separate answer claiming title in himself by virtue of a sheriff's deed. The plaintiff moved to strike out that part of the answer, but the record does not show what disposition, if any, was made of the motion. The court below found for the plaintiff. There is no bill of exceptions in the case preserving the evidence or motions, and, as has been repeatedly held by this court, the case cannot, therefore, be reviewed.
The judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed.
All concur.
RAY, J., not sitting.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Loving v. Trimble
...such exceptions are taken, they cannot be made the subject of review on appeal. Wentzville Tobacco Co. v. Walker, 123 Mo. 669; Ray v. Brown, 80 Mo. 230; Singer Mfg. Co. v. Stephens, 169 Mo. 1; v. McMurry, 258 Mo. 415; Wilson v. Haxby, 76 Mo. 345; Abbott v. Billum, 146 Mo. 176; Casler v. Cha......
-
State ex rel. Loving v. Trimble
...such exceptions are taken, they cannot be made the subject of review on appeal. Wentzville Tobacco Co. v. Walker, 123 Mo. 669; Ray v. Brown, 80 Mo. 230; Singer Mfg. Co. v. Stephens, 169 Mo. 1; McMurry v. McMurry, 258 Mo. 415; Wilson v. Haxby, 76 Mo. 345; Abbott v. Billum, 146 Mo. 176; Casle......
- Matson v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R.R. Co.