Ray v. Wells-Lamont Glove Factory, WELLS-LAMONT
Decision Date | 09 March 1959 |
Docket Number | No. 41066,WELLS-LAMONT,41066 |
Citation | 109 So.2d 544,236 Miss. 154 |
Parties | Mrs. Lois RAY v.GLOVE FACTORY et al. |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Laurel G. Weir, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Snow, Covington & Shows, Meridian, for appellee.
This is a claim for compensation on account of a hernia, and is made under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The attorney-referee denied the claim, and the full commission affirmed the decision, and on an appeal to the circuit court the decision of the full commission, which in this case was unanimous, was affirmed by the circuit court. This appeal is taken from that judgment.
During the month of May 1955 the claimant received an injury while at work for the appellee Wells-Lamont Glove Factory, which arose out of and in the course of her employment. The injury was a hernia in an old abdominal incision line where she had undergone sometime prior thereto a cesarean section. This hernia was repaired on May 26, 1955, by Dr. R. G. Hand of Philadelphia, Mississippi, who testified in the instant case that the former condition of the claimant was a post-surgical or post-operation hernia. The claimant was paid compensation by her employer for the period from May 24, 1955, to July 25, 1955 for temporary total disability in the sum of $197.55, and in addition, hospital and medical expenses in the total sum of $250, making a grand total of $447.55.
On February 10, 1958, the claimant signed a written statement for a representative of the insurance carrier which recited among other things that
Dr. Hand testified that after the operation in May 1955 for the post surgical or post-operation hernia, he did not see the claimant again until December 15, 1955. But she claims that she sustained her second injury while at work on April 12, 1956, and that she saw Dr. Hand the next day. The doctor's records disclose that he did see the claimant on April 13, 1956, but do not disclose that she said anything to him about having sustained an injury on the previous day, but her statements to him, as shown by his records, indicate that she had...
To continue reading
Request your trial