Rayburn v. State
| Decision Date | 07 February 2018 |
| Docket Number | No. CR–17–632,CR–17–632 |
| Citation | 542 S.W.3d 882 |
| Parties | Rodney RAYBURN, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee |
| Court | Arkansas Court of Appeals |
Eric Moore, for appellant.
Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Michael A. Hylden, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.
Appellant Rodney Rayburn was convicted by a jury of one count of rape and one count of criminal attempt to commit rape. He was sentenced to twenty-five years of imprisonment on the count of rape and fifteen years on the count of criminal attempt to commit rape with both sentences to run consecutively. The victim was his thirteen-year-old daughter, H.R. Rayburn appeals his conviction, arguing that the circuit court's admission of cumulative testimony of prior bad acts was prejudicial to him and deprived him of a fair trial. He argues that the circuit court abused its discretion when it admitted evidence of incidents other than the ones with which he had been charged. We disagree and affirm.
At trial, H.R. testified that Rayburn raped her at least fifteen times over the course of seven years. She testified that on one occasion in 2014, he told her to go into the bathroom and wait for him. Rayburn told his sons to go to their room and go to bed. He then went into the bathroom, told H.R. to get on her knees, and forced her to perform oral sex on him.
On another occasion, Rayburn instructed her to go into his room, and he instructed the boys to "fix a plate" for their mother. Then, he came into the bedroom and told H.R. to get on the bed and take off her pants. He performed oral sex on her and then for approximately ten minutes unsuccessfully attempted to penetrate her vaginally.
H.R. further testified that Rayburn attempted to penetrate her anally on a trip in 2015. They were at a campground, and he instructed her to go into the showers and wait for him. He entered the shower, told her to undress, and began washing her chest and private parts. After showering, he told her to dry off and get on her knees. He forced her to perform oral sex on him and then instructed her to bend over a bench. He attempted to penetrate her anally but was unable to do so.
Rayburn was also charged in relation to one incident in a mill parking lot. H.R. testified that she, her brother, and Rayburn had gone to pick up rice hulls in a truck. When they arrived, Rayburn told her to go to a sleeper in the back of the truck and get on the bed. He then entered the sleeper, and again tried to vaginally penetrate her. There, he forced her to perform oral sex on him.
The circuit court maintains discretion to admit evidence. Turner v. State , 2014 Ark App. 428, 439 S.W.3d 88. To reverse a circuit court's evidentiary ruling, it must have abused its discretion, and prejudice must have resulted. Id. Evidence of other wrongs or acts are not admissible to show a defendant's bad character, but this evidence is admissible to show proof of motive, opportunity, intent, or plan. Ark. R. Evid. 404(b) (2017). The "pedophile exception" to Rule 404(b) allows evidence of prior sexual conduct with children to show the defendant's proclivity for a specific act with a person and helps show the depraved sexual instinct of the accused. Chunestudy v. State , 2012 Ark. 222, 408 S.W.3d 55. Under the pedophile exception, we look at factors such as the time interval between the incidents, the similarity of the incidents, and whether the defendant had an intimate relationship with the victim. Parish v. State , 357 Ark. 260, 163 S.W.3d 843 (2004).
Here, H.R.'s testimony of all the incidents fell within the pedophile exception. Her testimony showed a pattern of ongoing sexual...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Scaggs v. State
...defendant had an intimate relationship with the victim. Parish v. State , 357 Ark. 260, 163 S.W.3d 843 (2004). Rayburn v. State , 2018 Ark. App. 84, at 3, 542 S.W.3d 882, 884.Scaggs argues that for the Rule 404(b) pedophile exception to apply, the victims do not have to live in the same hou......
-
Ralston v. State
...App. 5, at 13–14, 538 S.W.3d 227, 238 (citing Dimas-Martinez v. State , 2011 Ark. 515, 385 S.W.3d 238 ) ).32 Rayburn v. State , 2018 Ark. App. 84, at 3, 542 S.W.3d 882, 884 (citing Turner v. State , 2014 Ark. App. 428, 439 S.W.3d 88 ).33 Dolson , 2018 Ark. App. 440, at 7, 558 S.W.3d at 903–......
-
Rayburn v. State
...that jurisdiction. He was sentenced to a cumulative term of 480 months. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed. See Rayburn v. State , 2018 Ark.App. 84, 542 S.W.3d 882.The Cleburne County Sheriff's Department learned about the campsite rape in June 2016 after a status inquiry by the victim'......
-
Rayburn v. State
...circuit court's denial of Rayburn's petition for postconviction relief.Affirmed. Harrison and Murphy, JJ., agree.1 See Rayburn v. State , 2018 Ark. App. 84, 542 S.W.3d 882.2 Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.3(c) provides that an evidentiary hearing should be held in a postconviction p......