Razin v. Razin

Decision Date08 February 1955
Citation124 N.E.2d 269,332 Mass. 754
PartiesAsher RAZIN and others v. Bessle RAZIN and others.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Morris T. Silverstein, Everett (Richard J. O'Neil, Everett, with him), for petitioners.

Maurice Caro, Boston, for respondents.

Before QUA. C. J., and LUMMUS, WILKINS, SPALDING and COUNIHAN, JJ.

RESCRIPT.

This is a petition in equity filed in the Probate Court seeking the reconveyance of certain shares of stock alleged to have been transferred to the respondents by Isaac Razin through the fraud, duress, and undue influence of the respondents. The respondents filed demurrers, each alleging in substance inter alia that the petitioners are on the face of the petition not persons aggrieved and have therefore no standing in these proceedings. The petitioners argue in their brief that they are heirs in expectancy of Isaac Razin but nowhere in the petition is there an allegation to that effect. We are of opinion therefore that this situation is fully covered by what was said in Hogarth-Swann v. Weed, 274 Mass. 125, at page 132, 174 N.E. 314, at page 316: 'There is an incongruity in permitting those cousins to engage in contesting the proof of the instrument offered for probate as the will of the son so far as it concerns the disposition of the estate of the son. That is a subject in which they have no interest. They are strangers to his estate. Courts are not established to enable parties to litigate matters in which they have no interest affecting their liberty, rights or property.' See Horton v. Attorney General, 269 Mass. 503, 513-514, 169 N.E. 552.

Decrees sustaining demurrers and dismissing petition in equity affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Kirk v. MacDonald
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • October 4, 1985
    ...no interest in the property and thus no "standing." Hogarth-Swann v. Weed, 274 Mass. 125, 132, 174 N.E. 314 (1931); Razin v. Razin, 332 Mass. 754, 124 N.E.2d 269 (1955). 2. Issues regarding the validity of the mortgage. If admitted (in effect) to the foreclosure action, as we hold they shou......
  • HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Matt
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 14, 2013
    ...enable parties to litigate matters in which they have no interest affecting their liberty, rights or property.” See Razin v. Razin, 332 Mass. 754, 754, 124 N.E.2d 269 (1955), quoting Hogarth–Swann v. Weed, 274 Mass. 125, 132, 174 N.E. 314 (1931). To allow challenges by nonservicemembers, ev......
  • Luna Preservation Society v. Metropolitan District Commission
    • United States
    • Massachusetts Superior Court
    • February 28, 2000
    ... ... liberty, rights or property.' See Horton v. Attorney ... General, 269 Mass. 503, 513-14 [1929]." Razin ... v. Razin, 332 Mass. 754 (1955) ... LPS ... points to the assignment of rights to it from Terra/Mare in ... April of 1995. By that ... ...
  • Mazzu v. Mazzu
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • March 20, 2017
    ...affecting their liberty, rights or property." HSBC Bank USA, N.A . v. Matt , 464 Mass. 193, 199 (2013), quoting from Razin v. Razin , 332 Mass. 754, 754 (1955). Here, public records establish the following: the parties were divorced on February 26, 2007; the patent application was filed mor......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT