Rea v. Albert Elia Bldg. Co., Inc.
| Decision Date | 23 January 1981 |
| Citation | 435 N.Y.S.2d 849,79 A.D.2d 1102 |
| Parties | Philip John REA and Shirley Evelyn Rea, Appellants, v. ALBERT ELIA BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Respondent. ALBERT ELIA BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FURNCO CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Moran & Krenzer by C. A. Krenzer, Buffalo, for appellants.
Runals, Broderick & Shoemaker by John Runals, Niagara Falls, for respondent Albert Elia Bldg. Co., Inc.
Brown, Maloney, Gallup, Roach & Busteed, P. C., Buffalo, for respondent Furnco Const. Corp.
Before DILLON, P. J., and SIMONS, SCHNEPP, CALLAHAN and DOERR, JJ.
Plaintiff Philip John Rea is a welder employed by third-party defendant Furnco Construction Corporation, a subcontractor of defendant third-party plaintiff Albert Elia Building Company, Inc. On June 10 1976 he and a co-worker were on a scaffold erecting metal framework inside a holding tank being constructed as a part of a sewage treatment plant for the Town of Tonawanda. Plaintiff alleges that while he was so engaged, one of the ropes by which the scaffold was suspended parted and he fell to the concrete floor of the tank and he sustained serious injuries. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, moved for partial summary judgment claiming that the defendant is absolutely liable pursuant to the provisions of subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 240 of the Labor Law.
The statute provides that all scaffolding shall be "so constructed, placed and operated as to give proper protection" to employees using it (Labor Law, § 240 (subd. 1)) and it shall be "so constructed as to bear four times the maximum weight required to be dependent therefrom or placed thereon when in use" (id. subd. 3). Plaintiffs' pleadings bring their claim within both sections of the statute: they allege that the scaffold fell while in normal use, occupied by two men, when the rope parted causing it to fall. In rebuttal, defendant submitted the affidavit of its attorney. It does not deny plaintiffs' version of how the accident happened, it does not question plaintiffs' assertion that the scaffold fell because the rope parted or that it was in normal use occupied by two men at the time. Neither does defendant allege that the scaffold was overloaded. That being so, there are no factual issues on liability requiring a trial. Defendant has an absolute duty under the statute which it may not avoid by showing plaintiff's...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kalofonos v. State
...principles are foreign to a section 240 action (e.g., Crawford v. Leimzider, 100 A.D.2d 568, 569, 473 N.Y.S.2d 498; Rea v. Elia Bldg. Co., 79 A.D.2d 1102, 435 N.Y.S.2d 849), I cannot subscribe to the majority's thesis of equating "negligence" with "absolute liability". To be sure, a failure......
-
Kalofonos v. State
...of N. Y., supra, pp. 105-106, 414 N.Y.S.2d 718; see, also, Kenny v. George A. Fuller Co., supra, p. 186, 450 N.Y.S.2d 551; Rea v. Albert Elia Bldg. Co., supra ), and is absolute (see cases cited p. 649, supra ), whereas the latter is governed by negligence standards and is relative (i.e., c......
-
Maltais v. United States, 77-CV-98.
...of absolute or strict liability, as is the case with New York Labor Law §§ 240 and 241, see, e.g., Rea v. Albert Elia Bldg. Co., Inc., 79 A.D.2d 1102, 435 N.Y.S.2d 849 (4th Dep't 1981), the United States cannot be held liable under the FTCA for a claim arising under such a state law. Laird ......
-
Berghoff v. US
...Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 N.Y.2d 513, 493 N.Y.S.2d 102, 482 N.E.2d 898 (1985); Rea v. Albert Elia Building Co, 79 A.D.2d 1102, 435 N.Y.S.2d 849 (4th Dep't 1981). Section 241-a,3 which relates to planking over floor openings at construction sites, also imposes a non-delega......