Reamer v. United States, 12686.
| Decision Date | 13 December 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 12686.,12686. |
| Citation | 228 F.2d 906 |
| Parties | Leslie William REAMER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Jameson & Sislock, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.
Fred W. Kaess, George E. Woods, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
This appeal is taken from the district court's order denying appellant's motion to vacate sentence filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. Appellant's motion was based upon the claim that the evidence upon which he was convicted was inconsistent with the indictment. The indictment charged that appellant, in the course of a bank robbery, "did put in jeopardy the life of Fred W. Pluskat, by the use of a dangerous weapon, * * *." The evidence showed that it was actually appellant's co-defendant who held Pluskat at gun point.
Assuming that this claim was of a kind that could properly be made in a motion to vacate sentence, it was without merit. As the district court pointed out, a complete answer to the appellant's contention is the law that makes a principal of an aider and abettor. 18 U.S. C.A. § 2.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Templeton, 2007 Ohio 1148 (Ohio App. 3/14/2007)
..."The federal rule that an aider and abettor is punishable as a principal is identical. Section 2, Title 18, U.S. Code; Reamer v. United States (C.A.6, 1955), 228 F.2d 906; Roberts v. United States (C.A.6, 1955), 226 F.2d 464." State v. Graven, supra, 52 Ohio St.2d at 115-116, 369 N.E.2d 120......
-
State v. Hickman, 2004 Ohio 6760 (OH 12/13/2004), Case No. 2003-CA-00408.
..."The federal rule that an aider and abettor is punishable as a principal is identical. Section 2, Title 18, U.S. Code; Reamer v. United States (C.A.6, 1955), 228 F.2d 906; Roberts v. United States (C.A.6, 1955), 226 F.2d 464." State v. Graven, supra, 52 Ohio St.2d at 115-116, 369 N.E.2d 120......
-
U.S. v. Maselli
...United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20, 43 (6th Cir. 1965), affd., 385 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 408, 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966); Reamer v. United States, 228 F.2d 906 (6th Cir. 1955). The word "willfully" is not used in § 1952, and it was not necessary to use it in the indictment, since 18 U.S.C. § 2 is ......
-
State v. Graven
...The federal rule that an aider and abettor is punishable as a principal is identical. Section 2, Title 18, U.S. Code; Reamer v. United States (C.A.6, 1955), 228 F.2d 906; Roberts v. United States (C.A.6, 1955), 226 F.2d The appellant argues further that the crime of one charged as an aider ......