Reaves v. Catawba Mfg. & Elec. Power Co.

Decision Date02 May 1934
Docket Number420F.
Citation174 S.E. 413,206 N.C. 523
PartiesREAVES v. CATAWBA MFG. & ELECTRIC POWER CO.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Mecklenburg County; Stack, Judge.

Action by Manley Reaves against the Catawba Manufacturing & Electric Power Company. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

This is an action for actionable negligence brought by plaintiff against the defendant. The plaintiff's testimony was to the effect that he was injured some 10 years ago-in October 1924-when he was 13 years of age; he is now 23 years of age. His brother, Edgar, at the time he was hurt, was working for defendant as a brick mason. The defendant was building a frame dwelling house. The plaintiff lived three or four miles away, and on the day in question (and the only day he carried a lunch) he rode a horse and from his home carried the lunch in some dishes in a bucket to his brother. He testified, in part: "I stayed there during lunch. Afterwards, I was getting ready after lunch to get the dishes up and went to tell my brother I was going home and the carpenter on top of the house dropped his hammer and he asked me to get his hammer. Mr. Armstrong was the one that dropped the hammer and Mr. Black was the one that told me to take it up. Mr. Black was the foreman. * * * I started with the hammer. The house was frame and the rafters were raised. I started to climb up through a window and got up in the window and was climbing up to reach a joist to hand Mr. Armstrong the hammer and I slipped and fell, my hand slipped off the joist. That let me fall inside across a sleeper and broke my leg. That was the floor sleepers."

"By the Court: Was that window on the first floor, ground floor or second story? A. First floor.

Q. How far had you climbed? A. 8 ft. story.

Q. Had you climbed 8 ft.? A. Yes, climbed up to the second floor. There was no ladder there. There was no ladder afforded for any of them to go up on. I climbed up into the window, was catching up and climbed the post in the window frame. I climbed up in the window and was climbing over the window to reach up high enough to get him the hammer and as I caught the joist, I fell. I caught hold of a two by four, the framing. I climbed on the window frame and tried to get up to the top of the frame. I put my feet on the window frame and was going on up past it and holding to it. As I went up past it, I put my feet on top of it when I got up that high. I tried to go higher than that and got as high as I could, but I fell. My hand slipped off the top joist. That was a top joist that the rough framing rested on, up next to the roof. That was up at the top. I reckon I fell about eight feet. In climbing up there were no cross pieces across that way to put my feet on. I was in the act of taking the hammer up when I fell. I was handing it to him. I had one hand on the joist and the hammer in the other. I went to swing my hand with the hammer up through and it slipped and fell. * * * When I was told to go up on the house, I was preparing to go home. I had hitched my horse. I was about ten feet from the place where the hammer fell when I was told to take it up. Mr. Black said, 'Boy, take that hammer up to the carpenter." D'

Edgar Reaves testified in part: "I was a brick mason on this job. I worked on this job at the time. Mr. Black employed me. He paid me $1.00 an hour. * * * When I got through dinner I went back to work. I don't know if anybody asked my brother to bring the hammer up. I did not hear it. I sent after a hammer myself by Mr. Armstrong. He was up on the building. * * * There was not any ladder there to get up on the house at that time. I went up at the corners with braces climbed up at the corner. They did not have any ladder there. That is the way they went up and down. I have worked on other buildings. I had been working at that time on buildings about ten years. They did not have any ladder at all at this place for you to get up, just go up on the corners. They put braces across another and you stepped from one to the other and grabbed a joist and swung through. * * * The window was about fifteen feet away from the corner where I went up. It could be seen from the window where I went up. The braces within that space were about 3 1/2 feet apart. There were two braces. You stepped on them and grabbed a joist and pulled yourself up. As you stepped on this last brace, you would have to pull yourself through. You would do that by grabbing the over-head joist. It would be about 3 1/2 or 4 feet from the last brace. I could not say whether my brother could have gotten up at that corner or not, taking into consideration the size of my brother at that time. On a building like that they put a ladder up because you have to be going up and down."

On cross-examination: "Mr. Armstrong was working on the same side of the building. He was waiting on me. I told him to send me a hammer. * * * We was starting a stove flue and I told him to get me a hammer; he walked about 15 feet towards the house. It was not on the ground. The next thing I knowed the boy had fallen. Mr. Armstrong and I both went down on the ground, but not before the boy fell. When we went up, they had cross pieces there at the corner for me to climb up on. And I went up that way. Mr. Armstrong went up that way too. The carpenters, anybody that had to go up would go up different ways; I did not watch all of them. That's what they were put there for."

The judgment of the court below is as follows: "This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Judge presiding, and a jury, at the February 5, 1934, Regular Civil Term of Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, and the plaintiff's having introduced evidence, and the Court being of the opinion at the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence that the plaintiff ought to be non-suited: Now, therefore, upon motion of W. S. O'B. Robinson, Jr., attorney for the defendant, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the plaintiff be and he is hereby non-suited, and that the costs of the action be taxed against the plaintiff. This 16th day of February, 1934. A. M. Stack, Judge Presiding."

Willingness with which American people respond to calls for help is matter of common knowledge.

G. T. Carswell and Joe W. Ervin, both of Charlotte, for appellant.

W. S. O'B. Robinson, Jr., and W. B. McGuire, Jr., both of Charlotte, for appellee.

CLARKSON Justice.

At the close of plaintiff's evidence, the defendant made a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S. § 567. The court below granted the motion, and in this we can see no error. The interesting question arises on the record: What duty does the defendant owe to this volunteer boy 13 years of age? The general rule is thus laid down in Cooley on Torts (4th Ed.) vol. 3, § 386, pp. 47 and 48: "One who voluntarily assists a servant at the latter's request does not, as a general rule, become a servant of the master so as to impose upon the latter, the duties and liabilities of a master towards such volunteer, or so as to render the master liable to third persons injured by such volunteer's acts or negligence, while rendering such assistance. Such a volunteer assumes all the risks of the service upon which he enters and is only entitled to the protection due a trespasser. But if the servant has authority, express or...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT