Recordex Corp. v. Southeastern Metal Products, Inc., 55803

Decision Date05 September 1978
Docket NumberNo. 55803,55803
Citation147 Ga.App. 79,248 S.E.2d 159
PartiesRECORDEX CORPORATION v. SOUTHEASTERN METAL PRODUCTS, INC.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Nall & Miller, Gerald A. Friedlander, Atlanta, for appellant.

Northcutt, Edwards, Germano, Nix & Page, J. Lansing Kimmey, Atlanta, for appellee.

SHULMAN, Judge.

Southeastern Metal Products, Inc. (hereinafter "Southeastern") received a promissory note from Recordex following Recordex' bankruptcy reorganization. This appeal is from the judgment of the trial court, sitting without a jury, awarding Southeastern $9,821.97 principal plus $4,297.11 interest. We affirm the judgment.

1. The trial court awarded interest as of the date of default on each installment. In a three-part argument, appellant challenges the trial court's award of interest. Appellant urges that such award cannot stand because (a) appellee's claim was unliquidated; (b) appellee did not demand payment in writing until approximately four years after installment payments had ceased and no interest could be awarded prior to the date of demand; and (c) appellee failed to produce any evidence regarding the amount of interest due.

A. The trial court ordered that Recordex' obligation on the note be reduced by an amount equal to a fixed percentage of other payments made by Recordex to Southeastern for materials ordered by Recordex after bankruptcy. This credit was ordered because the items used by Southeastern to fill the new order were made up in part of materials and labor which were the subject of Southeastern's claim in bankruptcy and for which Recordex had already paid in part by giving the note.

Because of the crediting arrangement, appellant asserts that the obligation evidenced by the note is not liquidated and that the interest award is error. Contrary to this argument, the debt evidenced by the note herein for a sum payable in 18 monthly installments but bearing no interest is liquidated. Code Ann. § 57-110; Morgan v. Colt Co., 34 Ga.App. 630(6), 130 S.E. 600; Jenkins v. Morgan, 100 Ga.App. 561, 112 S.E.2d 23. The credit for duplicate payments only reduced the net balance on the liquidated claim; they do not render the note unliquidated. See Haygood v. Smith, 80 Ga.App. 461, 56 S.E.2d 310.

B. The trial court computed interest from the date of default on each payment as it became due and payable. Appellant's contention that interest must be computed from the date of written demand is not the law of this state. See Swanson v. Chase, 107 Ga.App. 295(2), 129 S.E.2d 873.

C. The award of interest in accordance with § 57-110 is not subject to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Walton Motor Sales, Inc. v. Ross
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 19 de julho de 1984
    ...by unliquidated credits. See Bassett Furniture Indus. v. NVF Co., 5 Cir.1978, 576 F.2d 1084, 1093; Recordex Corp. v. Southeastern Metal Prods., 1978, 147 Ga.App. 79, 248 S.E.2d 159, 159-60; Buck Creek Indus. v. Crutchfield & Co., 1974, 133 Ga.App. 80, 210 S.E.2d 32, 33-34; Haygood v. Smith,......
  • Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Price
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • 9 de junho de 2010
    ...into a claim for an uncertain and, therefore, unliquidated amount." Holloway, 537 S.E.2d at 125 (citing Recordex Corp. v. Se. Metal Prods., 147 Ga.App. 79, 248 S.E.2d 159 (1978) ). A claim for the total face amount paid on an insurance policy is, as in this instance, fixed, certain, and det......
  • Duff's Enterprises, Inc. v. B.F. Saul Real Estate Inv. Trust
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 27 de fevereiro de 1984
    ...and it is undisputed that this rate was used to compute the amount of interest awarded on judgment. Recordex Corp. v. Southeastern Metal Prods., 147 Ga.App. 79, 80(1C), 248 S.E.2d 159 (1978). The lease also provided for payment of attorney fees in collection of overdue amounts, and attorney......
  • Holloway v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 7 de julho de 2000
    ...858 (1936). 8. Enfinger v. Intl. Indem. Co., 257 Ga. 385, 359 S.E.2d 884 (1987). 9. See generally Recordex Corp. v. Southeastern Metal Products, 147 Ga.App. 79(1), 248 S.E.2d 159 (1978). 10. Rivergate Corp. v. Atlanta Indoor Advertising Concepts, 210 Ga.App. 501, 503(3), 436 S.E.2d 697 11. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT