Redman v. Hurley
Decision Date | 30 December 1896 |
Citation | 89 Me. 428,36 A. 906 |
Parties | REDMAN v. HURLEY. |
Court | Maine Supreme Court |
(Official.)
Appeal from supreme judicial court, Hancock county, in equity.
Bill by John B. Redman against Jeremiah Hurley. Decree for plaintiff, and defendant appeals, and moves for a new trial, and excepts. Appeal dismissed. Decree affirmed.
This was a bill in equity, under which the plaintiff, as assignee in insolvency of Colin McKenzie, sought to recover as assets of said McKenzie an undivided half of the "Eagle Hotel," so called, at Bar Harbor, together with an undivided half of the furniture in the hotel.
The defendant claimed title to the same, it being personal property, and situated on leased land, by a bill of sale to him from the said McKenzie, dated November 7, 1892, and recorded November 9, 1892, in the town of Eden.
The plaintiff claimed that the transfer was void, for the reason that it was made by McKenzie within six months before the filing of the petition in insolvency against him, and that said McKenzie, at the time of the alleged transfer, was either insolvent or acting in contemplation of insolvency, and made the alleged transfer to prevent the property from being distributed among his creditors under the insolvent laws of Maine. And also that the defendant at the time had reasonable cause to believe that said McKenzie was either insolvent or acting in contemplation of insolvency, and that the transfer was thus made to him to prevent the property from coming to the assignee.
Bill in Equity.
The defendant answered with a general denial, and asked to have the issues of fact submitted to a jury. The following are the issues passed upon by the jury, with their findings:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Indrisano
...v. Brockett, 3 How., U.S., 691, 692, 11 L.Ed. 786. Compare Jacker v. International Cable Co. Ltd. 5 T.L.R. 13; Redman v. Hurley, 89 Me. 428, 434, 36 A. 906;Burrill v. Giles, 119 Me. 111, 109 A. 390;Skidmore v. Harris, 157 Ky. 756, 761, 164 S.W. 98;Smith v. Newland, 40 Ill. 100;McKee v. Down......
-
Roebuck & Co. v. City Of Portland
...final decrees of a single Justice in Equity. In equity appeals to the Law Court, it hears the case anew upon the record. Redman v. Hurley, 89 Me. 428, 36 A. 906; Trask v. Chase, 107 Me. 137, 150, 77 A. 698, 704. ‘Upon the whole case the court is required to ‘affirm, reverse, or modify the d......
-
Usen v. Usen
...otherwise the appeal cannot be sustained. Revised Statutes, Chapter 91, Section 63; Emery v. Bradley, 88 Me. 357, 34 A. 167; Redman v. Hurley, 89 Me. 428, 36 A. 906; Caverly v. Small et al., 119 Me. 291, 111 A. In the instant case, neither the "evidence before the court below" nor "an abstr......
-
Farnsworth v. Whiting
...it need only be said that they have received due consideration from this court in arriving at its conclusions. Redman v. Hurley, 89 Me. 428, 434, 36 Atl. 906. In the first case, after careful examination of the record, we are of the opinion that the decree appealed from must be sustained. I......