Redmond v. Redmond

Decision Date25 July 2018
Docket NumberCA 18–00153,768
Citation163 A.D.3d 1475,83 N.Y.S.3d 754
Parties Holly M. REDMOND, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Denis M. REDMOND and Candace G. Redmond, Defendants–Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

163 A.D.3d 1475
83 N.Y.S.3d 754

Holly M. REDMOND, Plaintiff–Appellant,
v.
Denis M. REDMOND and Candace G. Redmond, Defendants–Respondents.

768
CA 18–00153

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Entered: July 25, 2018


MAXWELL MURPHY, LLC, BUFFALO (ALAN D. VOOS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT.

BARTH SULLIVAN BEHR, BUFFALO (LAURENCE D. BEHR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying those parts of defendants' motion seeking to strike plaintiff's expert witness disclosure and to preclude plaintiff's expert witness from testifying at trial regarding the 2010 Residential Code of New York State and the 2007 American National Standard Institute/National Spa and Pool Institute standard for aboveground/onground residential swimming pools, and reinstating the expert witness disclosure to that extent, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for personal injuries she allegedly sustained by striking her head on the bottom of an aboveground swimming pool after sliding head first down a water slide. Plaintiff alleges that

83 N.Y.S.3d 756

defendants were negligent with respect to the construction, ownership, use and control of their swimming pool and its component parts. Plaintiff's expert witness disclosure indicated that plaintiff's aquatic safety expert would testify that defendants' installation of a water slide on their aboveground swimming pool violated 16 CFR part 1207, which provides safety standards for swimming pool slides issued by the Consumer Product Safety Commission; the 2007 American National Standard Institute/National Spa and Pool Institute standard for aboveground/onground residential swimming pools (ANSI/NSPI–4); the Residential Code of New York State; and the Village of Wilson Zoning Law § 170–23. Defendants moved in limine seeking to strike plaintiff's expert witness disclosure and preclude the expert from testifying at trial. Supreme Court granted defendants' motion, and plaintiff appeals.

Initially, we note that the order granting...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • People v. McDonald, 109939
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 4, 2018
    ...v. Widger, 160 A.D.3d 1297, 1297–1298, 75 N.Y.S.3d 360 [2018] ). Defendant's remaining contentions, to the extent not specifically 83 N.Y.S.3d 754addressed, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit. ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. McCarthy, J.P., Devine, Aarons and Rumsey,......
5 books & journal articles
  • Expert witnesses
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books New York Objections
    • May 3, 2022
    ...expert study concerning school district crossing was not admissible as it was not related to accident risk at issue. Redmond v. Redmond, 163 A.D.3d 1475, 83 N.Y.S.3d 754 (4th Dept. 2018). In a personal injury action brought by plaintiff against homeowners for injuries sustained to plaintiff......
  • Expert witnesses
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2019 Contents
    • August 2, 2019
    ...expert study concerning school district crossing was not admissible as it was not related to accident risk at issue. Redmond v. Redmond, 163 A.D.3d 1475 (4th Dept. 2018). In a personal injury action brought by plaintif against homeowners for injuries sustained to plaintif ’s head when plain......
  • Expert witnesses
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2021 Contents
    • August 2, 2021
    ...expert study concerning school district crossing was not admissible as it was not related to accident risk at issue. Redmond v. Redmond, 163 A.D.3d 1475 (4th Dept. 2018). In a personal injury action brought by plaintif against homeowners for injuries sustained to plaintif ’s head when plain......
  • Witness
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Trial Objections
    • May 5, 2022
    ...patient’s right to pursue medical malpractice claim against physician were unenforceable as against public policy. Redmond v. Redmond , 163 A.D.3d 1475, 1476 (N.Y. App. 2018). It is within the sound discretion of the trial court to determine whether a witness may testify as an expert, and t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT