Reed v. Bankers Union of World
Decision Date | 08 January 1907 |
Citation | 99 S.W. 55,121 Mo.App. 419 |
Parties | REED, Respondent, v. BANKERS UNION OF THE WORLD, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Greene Circuit Court.--Hon. James T. Neville, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT.--This action is on policy No. 69082 for the sum of one thousand dollars, issued by defendant, insuring the life of Helen M Reed for the benefit of plaintiff, who was her husband. Mrs Reed died June 9, 1904. The petition alleges, and the answer admits, that defendant is a fraternal beneficiary order incorporated and having its chief office in the city of Omaha, in the State of Nebraska. The answer also admitted the issuance of the policy sued on, and pleaded, as a special defense, that the policy was forfeited on account of the failure of Helen M. Reed to make payments of her regular monthly dues on the first day of May and June, 1904, as required by the constitution and by-laws of the order which formed a part of the contract. Section C, Division 5, of the by-laws read in evidence is as follows:
Section C, division 8, of the by-laws, providing that any member who shall fail to pay his premiums, per capita tax, or his dues as required, shall stand suspended, and during such suspension his policy shall be null and void, was also read in evidence, as were the following:
Section B, same division, which provides
Section F, division 9, provides
The subordinate lodge of the order (Fair Grove No. 140) of which Helen M. Reed was a member, was suspended prior to April 1904. In May and June Mrs. Reed was sick and she and her husband directed their nephew, George T. Hines, to transmit the monthly dues to the supreme secretary at Omaha. The dues were seventy cents per month. For the month of May, 1904, a remittance was made on May 8th but was not received until the twentieth; for the month of June, the dues were sent to the supreme secretary on the sixth of the month. F. H. Drake was supreme secretary from May 11th to June 15, 1904, and on June 7, 1904, wrote Mrs. Reed as follows:
This letter was received by plaintiff, who testified that he also received a receipt for the May assessment.
Miss Margaret Murdock, who succeeded Drake as supreme secretary, testified that she has the custody of the books, showing the accounts of members that have paid direct to the home office, and those records show the May payment by Helen M. Reed was received at the home office on May twentieth, and that that payment was for the month of May; that the company received Helen M. Reed's dues for the month of June, same year, 1904, on the sixth day of June. Miss Murdock also testified that she notified Mrs. Reed that as her payments came subsequent to the first day of each month, it would be necessary for her to execute and return a health certificate; that her letter to Mrs. Reed, notifying her the company required a health certificate, bore date of June 28th, and that there never was a health certificate received from Helen M. Reed, and on June 29th she returned George T. Reed the two payments of dues of May and June.
On June 25, 1904, Miss Murdock wrote the following letter to insured:
This letter plaintiff also received.
Miss Murdock further testified that she returned the assessments of May and June, amounting to one dollar and forty cents, to plaintiff, by inclosing the amount in postage stamps in a letter, which she addressed to plaintiff at his post office (Fair Grove, Missouri), and put in the mail. Plaintiff testified he never received this letter and that the dollar and forty cents was never paid or tendered to him. The cross-examination of Miss Murdock by the court (to whom the issues were submitted, without the aid of a jury) indicates that it had some doubt of the correctness of Miss Murdock's evidence, in regard to the return of the one dollar and forty cents; for while she was quite positive she inclosed the dollar and forty cents in stamps in a letter and mailed the letter to plaintiff, she testified from certain memoranda which indicate that she may have been mistaken. This witness also testified that she mailed a blank health certificate to Mrs. Reed. Mrs. Reed was a consumptive and hence was unable to sign a certificate of good health, and neither of the certificates mailed to her by Drake or Miss Murdock were ever signed or returned to defendant. According to Miss Murdock's testimony, neither the May nor June assessments were ever credited on the defendant's books.
In respect to the duties of the supreme secretary, the by-laws provide:
At the close of the evidence, defendant moved the court to grant certain declarations of law, one of which was in the nature of a demurrer to plaintiff's evidence. The court refused to declare the law as requested by defendant and no other declarations of law were asked or given. The court found for plaintiff and rendered judgment in his favor for the amount of the policy.
Judgment affirmed.
G. G. Lydy for appellant.
(1) By the express terms of the benefit certificate in this case the policy, the articles of incorporation, constitution and by-laws, rules and regulations of the defendant, and the application for...
To continue reading
Request your trial