Reed v. Morton
Decision Date | 07 November 1888 |
Citation | 40 N.W. 282,24 Neb. 760 |
Parties | REED v. MORTON. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.
Where a wife executes a deed of her real estate, leaving the name of the grantee, the amount of consideration, and the date blank, and delivers such deed to her husbandfor the purpose of enabling him to sell and convey said real estate, such deed, duly filled up, in the hands of a bona fide grantee, who purchased the land from the husband, and paid the consideration therefor, will be sustained.
Where a wife executes a deed in blank as to the name of the grantee and in other respects, and delivers such deed to her husband, to sell and convey her real estate therein described, and the husband thereafter sells said real estate, and fills the blanks in said deed and delivers said deed to the grantee, and the wife knowingly uses a part or all of the consideration received therefor in her business, she will thereby ratify the sale and conveyance.
Appeal from district court, Saunders county; POST, Judge.
Action by Lottie G. Reed against R. B. Morton to quiet title to land in Saunders county. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
S. H. Sornborger, for appellant.
N. H. Bell and G. W. Simpson, for appellee.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff to quiet the title of certain real estate in Saunders county, of which she claims to be the owner. The defendant, in his answer, alleges ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Schauble v. Hedding
... ... 71; Van Etta v. Evenson, 28 Wis. 33, 9 Am. Rep ... 486; Morris v. Joyce, 63 N.J.Eq. 549, 53 A. 139; ... Putnam v. Clark, 29 N.J.Eq. 412; Reed v ... Morton, 24 Neb. 760, 40 N.W. 282, 1 L.R.A. 736, 8 Am ... St. 247; Guthrie v. Field, 85 Kan. 58, 116 P. 217, ... 37 L.R.A. (N.S.) 326 ... ...
-
Schauble v. Hedding
...Wis. 33, 9 Am. Rep. 486;Morris v. Joyce, 63 N. J. Eq. 549, 53 Atl. 139;Putnam v. Clark, 29 N. J. Eq. 412;Reed v. Morton, 24 Neb. 760, 40 N. W. 282,1 L. R. A. 736, 8 Am. St. Rep. 247;Guthrie v. Field, 85 Kan. 58, 116 Pac. 217,37 L. R. A. (N. S.) 326. We are not embarrassed by a rule which pr......
-
Ormsby v. Johnson
...title against his equity, even though they may be non sui juris." See, also, Baker v. Bartol, 7 Cal. 551; Reed v. Morton, 24 Neb. 760, 40 N.W. 282, 1 L.R.A. 736, 8 Am.St.Rep. 247; 2 Cyc. 171-172; 16 Cyc. 787-791. It becomes unnecessary to consider the assignments of error presented in the r......