Register v. Elder
Decision Date | 30 November 1910 |
Parties | REGISTER v. ELDER et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Testator devised 240 acres described to his executor in trust for his daughter to pay the income for the support of the daughter and her children, and on the daughter surviving her husband the property should vest in her absolutely, and on her death before her husband, leaving children, the trustee should use the income for the benefit of the children, and deliver the estate to them on their attaining a specified age, and on her death, leaving no child, the estate should pass to others. By a codicil he referred to the 240 acres as given to the executor for the use of the daughter, and annulled other provisions of the will. The daughter died leaving her husband and a child. Held, that the wife acquired only a life estate subject to the enlargement into a fee on the condition precedent of the death of the husband in her lifetime, and the husband was not entitled to curtesy, but the estate passed to the child.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Buchanan County; C. A. Mosman, Judge.
Action by Henry C. Register against Prather Elder and another. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
James W. Boyd, for appellant. Charles F. Strop and Eugene Silverman, for respondents.
Ejectment on formal pleadings. Cast below on a trial to the court, without a jury, plaintiff appeals. Defendants asked no instructions; plaintiff, one (refused), to the effect that, under the law, the pleadings, and the agreed statement of facts, he was entitled to judgment.
In small compass, preserving the substance of an agreed statement of facts, the case made is this: Plaintiff is the father of defendant, William L., the latter being the only surviving child of plaintiff and his wife, Martha Jane. William L. is in possession of the land in dispute, viz., the S. E. ¼ of section 10 and the W. ½ of the S. W. ¼ of section 11, all in township 56, range 35, in Buchanan county, through his codefendant, Elder, as tenant. One John Montgomery died testate, seised of the land as owner in June, 1903, leaving an only child, to wit, said Martha Jane; his will disposing of the land. This will and its codicil were probated in common as well as solemn form. Martha Jane dying, thereafter the son, then aged 36 years, took possession, putting his right thereto upon the terms of his said grandfather's will. Thereat plaintiff brought ejectment on the theory he was tenant by the curtesy as surviving husband of Martha Jane, and as such had the jus possessionis. The controversy hinges on the judicial interpretation of the will, the material clause being item 3, viz.:
After bequeathing $500 each to his brothers, Samuel and Thomas, and $500 each to his nieces, Georgia and Ellen, and to a friend, Isaiah McVey, and $10,000 to William Jewell College, to educate young men for the ministry and for the use of foreign missions in spreading the gospel, by items from 4 to 9 inclusive, item 10, which was annulled by the codicil, serves an office in outlining testator's plan. It reads:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Irvine v. Ross
...to the language used in other parts and effect given to the general intention therby ascertained. 40 Cyc., pp. 1413-1415; Register v. Elder, 231 Mo. 321; O'Day v. O'Day, 193 Mo. 62; Eckle Ryland, 256 Mo. 424; Snow v. Ferril, 8 S.W.2d 1008, 320 Mo. 569; Gardner v. Vanlandingham, 334 Mo. 1054......
-
Weller v. Searcy
... ... standpoint, and enforce the will as construed, provided it ... does not contravene the law. Register v. Elder, 231 ... Mo. 321; Dameron v. Lanyon, 234 Mo. 627; ... Threlkeld v. Threlkeld, 238 Mo. 459; McMillan v ... Barnard, 304 Mo. 635; ... ...
-
Thomas v. McGhee
... ... born of the marriage. Richter v. Bohnsach, 144 Mo ... 516; Donovon v. Griffith, 215 Mo. 149; Register ... v. Elder, 231 Mo. 321; 17 C. J. 416. (2) By the Act of ... 1921 curtesy was abolished; and in lieu of curtesy, the act ... gave the widower ... ...
-
Thomas v. McGhee
...if no child capable of inheriting is born of the marriage. Richter v. Bohnsach, 144 Mo. 516; Donovon v. Griffith, 215 Mo. 149; Register v. Elder, 231 Mo. 321; 17 C.J. 416. (2) By the Act of 1921 curtesy was abolished; and in lieu of curtesy, the act gave the widower the same share in the re......